检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李春蕊[1] 王天红 王晶晶 张雯[1] 毛鹏[1] LI Chun-Rui;WANG Tian-Hong;WANG Jing-Jing;ZHANG Wen;MAO Peng(Department of Pain Medicine,China-Japan Friendship Hospital,Beijing 100029,China)
出 处:《中国疼痛医学杂志》2018年第12期917-920,共4页Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较日间手术与住院手术慢性疼痛病人手术治疗的治疗效果、安全性和病房运行情况。方法:选取细银质针导热术病人122例,随机均分为日间手术组(R组)和住院手术组(Z组)。R组在疼痛门诊完成术前评估后收入日间病房,当日手术,当日出院;Z组在病房完善诊断及术前评估,择期施治,择期出院。两组均采用细银质针导热治疗,分别在术前、术后即刻、1天、1周和4周时评价病人的视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale, VAS)评分、SF-36生活质量评分,记录院前等候时间、住院时间、住院费用、病人和医师满意度,记录术中和术后有无并发症。结果:两组病人术前VAS评分和SF-36生活质量评分无明显差异(P> 0.05)。术后即刻、1天、1周和4周时的VAS评分明显低于术前(P <0.05),手术后即刻的SF-36评分与术前无明显差异(P> 0.05),但术后1天、1周和4周的SF-36评分明显高于术前基础值(P <0.05)。R组的院前等候时间、住院时间、住院费用均明显低于,病人和医师满意度均明显高于Z组(P <0.05)。两组均未发生明显手术并发症。结论:疼痛科微创介入技术适合日间手术模式,具有广阔的应用前景。Objective:To compare the efficacy,safety,and ward operation of pain management in day surgery patients and inpatient surgery patients.Methods:One hundred and twenty-two patients undergoing thin silver needle thermal therapy were randomly allocated to either day surgery group(R,n=61)or inpatients group(Z,n=61).For patients of group R,preoperative assessment was completed in the pain clinic,and patients were admitted to the day surgery ward on the surgery day and were discharged after surgery on the same day;For patients of group Z,diagnose,preoperative assessment,operation and discharge were all on schedule in the inpatient ward.Thin silver needle thermal therapy was performed for both groups.The visual analogue scale(VAS)and SF-36 scores were assessed at the time points including pre-surgery,immediately after surgery,1 day,1 week,and 4 weeks after surgery.Patients'prehospital waiting time,hospital stay,hospitalization costs,patients and physicians'satisfaction,and complications,if any,during and after surgery were also recorded.Results:There was no significant difference in VAS and SF-36 scores at pre-surgery between both groups(P>0.05).The VAS scores at time points including immediately after surgery,1 day,1 week and 4 weeks after surgery,were all lower significantly than pre-surgery baseline in both groups(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in SF-36 score at immediately after surgery in both groups.The SF-36 scores at time points including 1 day,1 week,and 4 weeks after surgery were all higher significantly than pre-surgery baseline(P<0.05).Pre-hospital waiting time,hospital stay,and hospitalization costs in group R were considerably lower,and the patients and physicians'satisfaction were significantly higher than those in group Z(P<0.05).No significant complications occurred in both groups.Conclusion:The minimally invasive interventional technique for pain management is suitable for day surgery and has broad application prospects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30