古籍题跋整理与研究应注意的问题——以黄丕烈藏书题跋的整理为例  

Problems to Be Noted in the Collation and Research of Ancient Book Inscriptions and Postscripts——Take Huang Pilie's Collection as An Example

作　　者：赵嘉[1] Zhao Jia

机构地区：[1]河北大学文学院

出　　处：《图书馆理论与实践》2018年第11期63-67,共5页Library Theory and Practice

基　　金：河北省社会科学基金2017年度项目"河北书贾王文进<文禄堂书影>研究"(项目批准号:HB17TQ007)阶段性成果

摘　　要：古籍题跋是我国传统版本目录学发展到一定时期的产物,特别是在清代目录、版本、校勘之学得到充分发展之时,这一期间的题跋往往因涉及了书籍的版本异同、字句内容差异、书籍递藏源流、著书大旨等方面而更具文献学价值。黄丕烈的藏书题跋便是其中的重中之重,从清末以来便陆续有学者对其加以整理、出版。然而笔者通过将前人整理的黄氏题跋与真迹比较,发现存在一些谬误。通过对这些问题加以揭示和分析,可以为当今古籍题跋的整理与研究方向提供借鉴和参考。Ancient book inscriptions and postscripts are the product of Chinese traditional edition bibliography development to a certain period.Book inscriptions and postscripts,especially in the Qing Dynasty when catalogue,editions and collation were fully developed,are of more philological value because they involved the similarities and differences of editions,the differences of words and sentences,the origin and development of books,and the main purpose of writing books.Inscriptions and postscripts of Huang Pilie’s collection are more important and were paid great attention to at that time.Therefore,scholars have been collating and publishing them since the late Qing Dynasty.However,the author finds that there are some fallacies by comparing Huang’s inscriptions and postscripts with authentic ones.By revealing and analyzing these problems,it wish to provide reference for the collation and research direction of the ancient book inscriptions and postscripts.

关 键 词：黄丕烈 藏书题跋 辑录体 王文进《文禄堂书影》 

分 类 号：G256.4[文化科学—图书馆学]