机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院腹部超声科,150001
出 处:《中华医学超声杂志(电子版)》2018年第10期767-772,共6页Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的探讨实时组织弹性成像(RTE)联合超声造影技术评估乙型肝炎肝纤维化的临床应用价值,为评价慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化提供新的无创诊断方法。方法选取2016年10月至2017年5月在哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院就诊的慢性乙型肝炎患者61例,并行肝活检,根据Scheuer标准分为5期(S0~S4),所有患者均行RTE及超声造影检查,计算肝纤维化指数(LFI)与肝肾达峰时间差(Lt-Kt)。采用方差分析比较肝纤维化各组的LFI值与Lt-Kt值,并与病理结果做相关分析。进一步两两比较采用LSD-t检验,以肝活检为"金标准"得到各组诊断受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。结果 LFI值S1期与S2期间比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05),Lt-Kt值S0期与S1期间比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05),LFI值S0与S1、S2、S3、S4期多重比较(t=-2.32、-3.92、-6.35、-11.58),LFI值S1与S0、S2、S3、S4期多重比较(t=2.32、-1.59、-4.15、-9.44),LFI值S2与S0、S1、S3、S4期多重比较(t=3.92、1.59、-3.31、-9.86),LFI值S3与S0、S1、S2、S4期多重比较(t=6.35、4.15、3.31、6.28),LFI值S4与S0、S1、S2、S3期多重比较(t=11.58、9.44、9.86、6.28)。Lt-Kt值S0与S1、S2、S3、S4期多重比较(t=-1.81、-4.51、-5.98、-9.58),Lt-Kt值S1与S0、S2、S3、S4期多重比较(t=1.81、-2.37、-3.94、-7.60),Lt-Kt值S2与S0、S1、S3、S4期多重比较(t=4.51、2.37、-2.12、-6.69),Lt-Kt值S3与S0、S1、S2、S4期多重比较(t=5.98、3.94、2.12、-4.37),Lt-Kt值S4与S0、S1、S3、S4期多重比较(t=9.58、7.60、6.69、4.37),差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。LFI对应ROC曲线下面积分别为0.953、0.924、0.916、0.983;Lt-Kt对应ROC曲线下面积分别为0.979、0.967、0.902、0.949。二者联合后对应ROC曲线下面积分别为0.988、0.974、0.918、0.966。结论 RTE及超声造影在乙型肝炎肝纤维化诊断中均有重要价值,超声造影在纤维化早期(S1~S2)较RTE更有优势,而RTE在纤维化中晚期(S3~S4)较超声造影更有优势,二�Objective To investigate the clinical value of real-time elastography(RTE)and contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B,in order to provide a new noninvasive method for assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.Methods Sixty-one patients with chronic hepatitis B were divided into five groups according to the pathological stage of hepatic fibrosis:S0-S4.All the patients underwent RTE and CEUS examinations.The liver fibrosis index(LFI)and liver-kidney peak time difference(Lt-Kt)were calculated and analyzed by one-way ANOVA,followed by pairwise comparisons using the LSD-t test and the SNK test.The receiver operating characteristic curves(ROCs)were plotted based on the stage of liver fibrosis and used to evaluate the diagnostic value of real-time elastography and CEUS,alone or in combination.Results There was no significant difference in LFI values between stages S1and S2and between stages S0and S1(P>0.05);however,a significant difference was observed in LFI values between S0and S1,S2,S3,or S4(t=2.32,3.92,6.35,11.58),between S1and S0,S2,S3,or S4(t=2.32,1.59,4.15,9.44),between S2and S0,S1,S3,or S4(t=3.92,1.59,-3.31,-9.86),between S3and S0,S1,S2,or S4(t=6.35,4.15,3.31,6.28),and between S4and S0,S1,S2,or S4(t=11.58,9.44,9.86,6.28)(P<0.05for all).A significant difference was also observed in Lt-Kt values between S0and S1,S2,S3,or S4(t=-1.81,-4.51,-5.98,-9.58),between S1and S0,S2,S3,or S4(t=1.81,-2.37,-3.94,-7.60),between S2and S0,S1,S3,or S4(t=4.51,2.37,-2.12,-6.69),between S3and S0,S1,S2,or S4(t=5.98,3.94,2.12,-4.37),and between S4and S0,S1,S3,or S4(t=9.58,7.60,6.69,4.37)(P<0.05for all).The areas under the ROCs(AUROCs)of LFI for S1-S4were0.953,0.924,0.916,and0.983,respectively,and the AUROCs of Lt-Kt for S1-S4were0.979,0.967,0.902,and0.949,respectively.The AUROCs of LFI combined with Lt-Kt for S1-S4were0.988,0.974,0.918,and0.966,respectively.Conclusion RTE and CEUS have important value in the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.C
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R512.62[医药卫生—诊断学] R575.2[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...