检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗培 敖敦格日乐 P.Myagmartseren Ts.Bazarkhand E.Altanbold 赛西雅拉图[1] Luo Pei(College of Geographical Science,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot 010022,China)
机构地区:[1]内蒙古师范大学地理科学学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010022 [2]Department of Geography,National University of Mongolia
出 处:《安徽农学通报》2018年第23期102-105,共4页Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"典型草原牧区游牧与定居方式放牧下的草原群落变迁机制比较研究-以中蒙两国国境线两侧对应嘎查浩特为例"(41561009);内蒙古师范大学研究生科研创新基金项目"牧区定居网围栏轮牧对克氏针茅草原群落多样性的影响"(CXJJS18104)
摘 要:以中蒙边境内蒙古那仁宝拉格苏木和蒙古国纳兰苏木牧户的绵羊群为例,通过aLocoh和Kernel Den-sity Estimator法,结合实地植物采样,对不同放牧方式下绵羊群日运动轨迹进行了对比研究,结果表明:定居放牧方式下绵羊群对草场的采食压力较大,不利于草场的自我修复,草场生产力下降几率高于游牧方式;定居放牧方式下绵羊群对活动草场的踩踏压力值高,草原生态退化的风险几率高于游牧方式;不同的放牧方式可能导致草原生产力的降低和草原生态系统的破坏。The article takes the sheep flock of Narenbaolago Sumu in Inner Mongolia and Nalan Sumu in Mongolia as an example.The methods of aLocoh and Kernel Density Estimator combined with field plant sampling were used to compare the trajectories of the flocks in different grazing patterns.The conclusions are as follows:First,under the pattern of Settled grazing,the flocks have a greater pressure on the grassland,which is not conducive to the self-repair of the pasture,and the probability of decline in grassland productivity is higher than that of nomadic pattern;Second,the risk of stepping on the grassland is high under the method of colonization and rotation,and the risk of grassland ecological degradation probability is higher than the nomadic way;Finally,Different grazing patterns may lead to a decline in grassland productivity and destruction of grassland ecosystems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7