理论创新只能从问题开始——对3篇评议文章的答复  

Theoretical Innovation Can Only Be Started from Problem: Reply to Comments of 3 Review Papers

作　　者：冯增昭[1] FENG Zengzhao

机构地区：[1]中国石油大学(北京),北京100083

出　　处：《中国科技术语》2018年第6期47-49,共3页CHINA TERMINOLOGY

摘　　要：文章是对苏德辰和乔秀夫、蒋汉朝、嵇少丞等专家评议冯增昭先生《Seismites、地震岩、震积岩和软沉积物变形构造等术语问题的讨论》一文的答复意见。主要内容为:(1)同意嵇少丞教授的意见"seismites本应译成地震岩",因为翻译的首要准则是忠于原著。(2)更重要的是seismites这一术语的根据问题。赛拉赫1969年提出seismites的根据是美国加州西海岸中新世蒙特雷页岩中的4个"断层-粒序岩层"。这4个"断层-粒序岩层"中的构造主要是有白色充填物的裂隙,这些裂隙有小的错动,看不到大的断层。它们不是软沉积物变形构造,也不是地震岩,因为它没有地震成因的证据。这4个"断层-粒序岩层"的成因研究已涉及构造地质学的研究范畴了。(3)理论创新只能从问题开始。山穆玕是近50年来首次质疑赛拉赫seismites的地质学家,功不可没。(4)seismites等术语的学术讨论和争鸣,在理论上是有所创新的。这说明百花齐放和百家争鸣的方针确实是促进科学研究和科学发展的有效措施。This paper is a reply to 3 review papers by SU Dechen,QIAO Xiufu,JIANG Hanchao and JI Shaocheng:(1)The author agrees with the viewpoint of Prof.JI Shaocheng:“Seismites should be translated into dizhenyan(地震岩)”,because translation should be true to the original.It should not be a problem.(2)The most important problem is the foundation of“seismites”,i.e.,the 4“fault graded beds”proposed by Seilacher(1969)in which fractures are filled with white infillings.They are not SSDS.They are not seismites because they are without evidence of seismic origin.The researches of these fractures are related to the domain of structural geology.(3)Theoretical innovation can only be started from problem.Shanmugam firstly proposed that the foundation of the term seismites proposed by Seilacher is problematic.(4)The discussion and contending about seismites,etc.,has got some theoretical innovation.It means that the policy“A hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought contend”is an effective measure to promote the progress of scientific researches.

关 键 词：SEISMITES 地震岩 软沉积物变形构造 构造地质学 

分 类 号：N04[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学] H083[语言文字—语言学]