检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡姮[1] 曹云昌[1] 尹聪[2] 段晓梅 HU Heng;CAO Yunchang;YIN Cong;DUAN Xiaomei(Meteorological Observation Centre,CMA,Beijing 100081. China;Nanjing University of Information Science Technology . Nanjing 210044. China;Chengdu University of Information Technology. Chengdu 610225, China)
机构地区:[1]中国气象局气象探测中心,北京100081 [2]南京信息工程大学,南京210044 [3]成都信息工程大学,成都6102251
出 处:《气象学报》2018年第6期1029-1039,共11页Acta Meteorologica Sinica
基 金:第三次青藏高原大气科学试验--边界层与对流层观测(GYHY201406001);公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201406012)
摘 要:为了探讨青藏高原大气可降水量观测资料的可靠性,对2015年6—9月西藏申扎、改则和那曲3站地基GNSS遥感的大气可降水量、同址探空观测的大气可降水量、风云三号可见光红外扫描辐射计反演的晴空大气可降水量、MODIS大气可降水量和NCEP可降水量进行对比分析。结果表明:探空可降水量和地基GNSS可降水量的偏差较小,均低于2.5 mm。风云三号可降水量明显偏低,与其他观测结果的偏差超过6 mm。全自动探空可降水量离散程度较L波段探空大,均方根误差超过4 mm。In order to investigate the reliability of the observation of precipitable water vapor in the Tibetan Plateau,this article compares and analyzes five different observations collected at Naqu,Gaize and Shenzha from June to September2015.Observations include the GNSSPW,the radiosonde PW,the FY-3visible infrared scanning radiometer sensing data(FY-3PW),the MODIS remote sensing data and the NCEP gridded reanalysis data(NCEP PW).The result shows that the radiosonde PW and the GNSS PW are closed with the differences less than2.5mm.FY-3PW is significantly drier than the other observations,and the biases are larger than6mm.The degree of dispersion for precipitable water vaporo bserved by the automatic sounding systems at Gaize and Shenzha stations is obviously larger than that by the L-band electron radiosonde at Naqu Station,and the RMSE is larger than4mm.
关 键 词:青藏高原 大气可降水量 地基GNSS 探空 卫星产品 对比分析
分 类 号:P413[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222