公司利润分配案件审理中司法权介入的限度——以《公司法司法解释四》第15条为中心  

The Limit of Judicial Intervention in the Trial of Company Profit Distribution Cases:An Analysis Focusing on Article 15 of Judicial Interpretations of Company Law(Ⅳ)

作　　者：曹文兵 汪腰强 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]渝农商金融租赁有限责任公司

出　　处：《法治现代化研究》2018年第6期108-116,共9页Law and Modernization

基　　金：司法部2016年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目(16SFB2005)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在审判实务中,法院往往对抽象的股东利润分配请求权秉持过分保守态度。《公司法司法解释四》第15条的规定首次为中小股东抽象利润分配请求权的保护打开了一条绿色的司法救济通道,肯定了抽象利润分配请求权的可诉性,填补了中小股东利益保护机制不完善的立法漏洞。但是该条款也存在着"股东滥用权利"的判断标准不明确、举证责任分配失衡、裁判方式不具体等不够周延的地方,需要进一步地解释与细化,从而确保类案裁判标准的统一。In trial practice,the courts tend to maintain an excessively conservative attitude towards the shareholders'claim for the distribution of abstract profits.The provisions of Article 15 of the Judicial Interpretations of Company Law(IV)have for the first time opened a judicial“green channel”to protect the small and medium shareholders'claims for abstract profits,affirmed the justiciability of such claims,and filled in the legislative loopholes in this regard.However,Article 15 is also inadequate to some extent in that there is a lack of clear definition of shareholders'abuse of their rights,balanced distribution of burden of proof,and concrete trial methods to make correct judicial decisions.Such inadequacy calls for further detailed interpretations and specifications to ensure the unity in the criteria governing the judicial decisions over cases of this type.

关 键 词：公司利润分配 控制股东 资本多数决 滥用 司法权介入 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]