再分配的收入差距调节效应:城乡和国际比较  

Income Gap Adjustment Effect of Redistribution:Urban-Rural and International Comparison

作　　者：耿晋梅[1] 岳树民[2] GENG Jin-mei;YUE Shu-min(Business School, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006,China;School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]山西财经大学经济学院,太原030006 [2]中国人民大学财政金融学院,北京100872

出　　处：《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第1期126-133,共8页Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(12CJY057)

摘　　要：本文以CHNS收入分类数据为基础,对全国城乡家庭居民收入的初次分配和再分配收入差距进行了测算和分析。结果表明,中国居民初次分配收入的基尼系数高出OECD国家平均值13.9%,与金砖国家水平相当;再分配后,发达国家的居民收入差距大幅下降,再分配的收入差距调节效应为0.172,中国仅为0.085;尽管城镇地区转移支付的调节效应高于多数发达国家,但税收的调节效应和农村地区转移支付的调节效应微弱,中国居民可支配收入差距还是远高于绝大多数发达国家,高出平均值48%。Based on the CHNS nationally household income survey classificationdata,calculate and analyse the income gap of primary distribution and redistribution.The results show that the Gini coefficient of the primary income distribution of Chinese residents is13.9%higher than the average of OECD countries,which is equivalent to that of BRICS countries.After redistribution,the Gini coefficient of the developed countries decreases dramatically,and the adjustment effect of redistribution is0.172,while that of China is only0.085.Although the adjustment effect of transfer payment in urban areas is higher than most developed countries,the adjustment effect of tax revenue and transfer payment in rural areas is weak.The disposable income gapof Chinese residents is still much higher than that of most developed countries,which is48%higher than the average.

关 键 词：再分配 初次分配 调节效应 

分 类 号：F812[经济管理—财政学] F202