《离骚传》窜入《屈原列传》辨  

Debate on the Issue that The Legend of Li Sao was Mixed into Biography of Qu Yuan

作　　者：谢天鹏[1] XIE Tianpeng(Institute for Non-orthodox Chinese Culture,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610065,China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学中国俗文化研究所,四川成都610065

出　　处：《云梦学刊》2019年第1期47-52,共6页Journal of Yunmeng

摘　　要：《屈原列传》于叙述上有所不通,因此引起一部分学者怀疑。汤炳正先生《〈屈原列传〉理惑》以为是后人将刘安《离骚传》窜入《屈原列传》。由文献比较来看,班固《离骚赞序》、王逸《离骚经章句序》皆有简化《屈原列传》之痕迹,而今本《屈原列传》基本上与班固、王逸所见之本一致,其中包括汤氏所认为窜入之两段。由此可知,司马迁所作《屈原列传》已经对《离骚传》加以采取。又,汤氏以窜乱说为基础而解决《屈原列传》中诸疑义,以此而佐证窜乱说。详考之,汤氏所举之疑义或不存在,或对疑义之解决亦尚难成立。The incoherent paragraphs in Biography of Qu Yuan have raised several scholars’ doubt. Professor Tang Bingzheng states in his book Clarification on Questions in Biography of Qu Yuan that the incoherence is the result of an issue that Liu An’s The Legend of Li Sao was mixed into the Biography of Qu Yuan by someone in later generations. But after material comparison, we found Ban Gu’s Preface to Li Sao Zan and Wang Yi’s Preface to Commentaries on Li Sao were all written based on Biography of Qu Yuan, but in more concise language. Moreover, the current version of Biography of Qu Yuan is basically accordance with versions what Ban Gu and Wang Yi read, including the two paragraphs which Professor Tang regards as "being mixed into Biography of Qu Yuan". So we can conclude that Si’ma Qian had cited some parts in The Legend of Li Sao while he was writing Biography of Qu Yuan. Additionally, Professor Tang explains the questions in Biography of Qu Yuan according to the statement that The Legend of Li Sao was mixed into Biography of Qu Yuan, and conversely uses this result to prove the statement. However,some of the so-called questions don’t really exist, and other questions, as the matter of fact, have not been solved by Professor Tang.

关 键 词：《〈屈原列传〉理惑》 《离骚传》 窜乱说 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]