大数据时代下中荷域名的取得和法律保护比较研究  

Comparative Study on the Acquisition and Legal Protection of Sino-Dutch Domain Names in the Era of Big Data

作　　者：吴镱俊 WU Yijun(School of Law,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241002,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学法学院,安徽芜湖241002

出　　处：《皖西学院学报》2018年第6期34-38,共5页Journal of West Anhui University

基　　金：2016年度国家法制与法学理论研究项目(16SFB5026)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：大数据时代背景下,域名不仅只是代表网络上的某个地址,更代表着凝聚其中的商业价值。鉴于我国的现行法律法规并不能顺应网络信息时代的快速发展,并且关于域名的性质也缺乏法律上准确清晰的定位,因此对于域名的规制及保护依然很难通过特定的法律法规实现,极易引发相关纠纷。域名并不同于传统意义上的知识产权,揆诸域名与传统知识产权之间的关系,本文首先对二者进行界定,并通过论证荷兰的域名取得和域名纠纷解决方法以及两个方面对于域名的法律保护机制,结合我国相关的法律规定和立法现状,从而探寻我国域名法律保护的完善机制。In the era of big data,with the rapid development of the Internet today,domain names represent not only an address on the network,but also the business value.China’s current laws and regulations can not adapt to the rapid development of the network information age,and China lacks legal accurate and clear positioning of the nature of domain names.Therefore,the regulation and protection of domain names are still difficult to achieve through specific laws and regulations,which easily lead to related disputes.Domain names are different from traditional intellectual property rights such as trademark rights.Firstly,this paper clarifies the relationship between domain names and traditional intellectual property rights,and explores the relationship between domain names and traditional intellectual property rights by demonstrating domain name acquisition and domain name dispute resolution in the Netherlands,as well as the legal protection mechanism of domain names in two aspects,combining with the relevant legal provisions and legislative status quo in China.Thus the perfection of legal protection of domain names in China can be realized.

关 键 词：网络域名 域名注册 域名保护 立法建议 

分 类 号：D913.4[政治法律—民商法学]