检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李彩瑛 阎建忠[1] 花晓波 张镱锂[3] LI Caiying;YAN Jianzhong;HUA Xiaobo;ZHANG Yili(College of Resources and Environment,Southwest University,Chongqing 400716,China;Graduate School of Asian and African Area Studies,Kyoto University,Kyoto 606-8501,Japan;Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China)
机构地区:[1]西南大学资源环境学院,重庆400716 [2]京都大学亚洲非洲地域研究研究科 [3]中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室,北京100101
出 处:《山地学报》2018年第6期930-941,共12页Mountain Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41571093);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA20040201)~~
摘 要:家庭生计脆弱性评估有利于深入理解脆弱人群的特征,为政府制定气候变化适应策略和农牧民脱贫提供科学依据。本文利用西藏"一江两河"地区188户调研数据,基于可持续生计框架,在"风险-生计资产-适应能力"维度上构建农牧民家庭生计脆弱性指标体系,采用K-均值聚类方法对家庭分类并比较其生计脆弱性差异。结果表明:(1)高脆弱性家庭占比43. 09%,其整体表现为风险最高,生计资产和适应能力最低;(2)与低脆弱性家庭相比,高脆弱性家庭的特点主要是自然资源依赖度更高、受极端气象灾害影响较大、生计资产缺乏、生计多样化程度不高、资金补贴不足等。本文从积极应对自然灾害、提高农牧民教育水平和促进生计多样化等方面提出政策建议。Although numerous studies concerned about the livelihood vulnerability to climate change at district or community level,few researches on how to precisely identify the vulnerable population have been done.A household-level assessment of livelihood vulnerability contributes to a deeper understanding of the characteristics of vulnerable population,enlightening the policymaker to develop climate change adaptation strategies and poverty alleviation policies for farmers and herders.In this study,188 households were investigated along the Yarlung Zangbo River,the Nyangqu River and the Lhasa River Region(the YNL river region)in the Tibetan Plateau.Followed by a framework of sustainable livelihood analysis and an approach of evaluation on“risk-livelihood assetadaptive capacity”,a household-level livelihood vulnerability indicator system was introduced and accordingly the sampled households were classified into two categories(i.e.,the highly and the lowly vulnerable households)using K-means clustering.The results showed that:(1)The highly vulnerable households accounted for 43.09%of all involved households,which featured in a higher level of risk,but a lower level of livelihood assets and adaptive capacity as compared with those of the lowly vulnerable households.(2)Compared to the lowly vulnerable households,the distinguishing feature of the highly vulnerable households were those,such as highly subjected to natural resources,more susceptible to extreme climate disasters,poor livelihood diversification,and insufficient government subsidies.The study suggests that the government should actively take actions to control natural disasters,to improve educational level and to promote livelihood diversification,which would help farmers and herders improve their adaptive capacity and reduce livelihood vulnerability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7