检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟向明[1,2] 何晓敏 杜清[1] 袁璟[1] 刘堃[1] 宋明洋[1] 丛建妮[1] 黄小敏[1] ZHAI Xiang-ming;HE Xiao-min;DU Qing(Binzhou Medical University,Yantai,Shandong,264003,China)
机构地区:[1]滨州医学院,山东烟台264003 [2]西安交通大学,陕西西安710049
出 处:《中国医院管理》2019年第1期22-24,共3页Chinese Hospital Management
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(15YJCZH037);滨州医学院青年骨干教师培养计划;2018年度山东省卫生计生政策研究重点课题
摘 要:目的评价S省县级公立医院综合改革,尤其是补偿机制改革对县级公立医院收支结构的影响。方法通过对88家县级综合公立医院2011—2015年收支数据进行统计处理,分析改革前后收支结构的变化。结果取消药品加成后,试点医院收入增长逐渐变缓,药占比下降明显,但是检查、检验和耗材收入出现替代性上升,医疗服务价格调整效果不明显。结论破除"以药补医"效果良好,但补偿机制改革未达预期,建议进一步理顺医疗服务价格,探索改革和建立政府财政投入长效机制。Objective To evaluate the impact of comprehensive reform of county public hospitals in S Province,especially the reform of compensation mechanisms on the income and expenditure structure of county public hospitals.Methods Statistical analysis was conducted on the income and expenditure data of the 88 general hospitals from 2011 to 2015,and the changes of the income and expenditure structure before and after the reform were analyzed.Results After the elimination of drug addition,the income growth of the pilot hospitals gradually slowed down,and the proportion of the drug occupation ratio decreased obviously.However,the income of examination,inspection and consumables increased in a substitutable way,and the effect of medical service price adjustment was not obvious.Conclusion The effect of removing"supporting medicine with drugs"is good,but the reform of compensation mechanism is not expected.It is suggested to further rationalize the price of medical service,explore the reform,and establish the longterm mechanism of government financial input.
分 类 号:R197.322[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.212