检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王恒知[1] 俞言祥[2] 何斌[1] 彭小波 詹小艳[1] 朱升初[1] WANG Heng-zhi;YU Yan-xiang;HE Bin;PENG Xiao-bo;ZHAN Xiao-yan;ZHU Sheng-chu(Jiangsu Earthquake Agency,Nanjing 210014,China;Institute of Geophysics,China Earthquake Administration,Beijing 100081,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏省地震局,南京210014 [2]中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京100081
出 处:《地震地质》2018年第6期1349-1361,共13页Seismology and Geology
基 金:江苏省地震局局长基金(201501JY);江苏省科技支撑计划-社会发展(BE2014731);中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH16014)共同资助
摘 要:2012年7月20日江苏高邮、宝应交界处发生4. 9级地震。文中利用江苏省强震动台网获取的43组主震强震动记录,从地震动峰值特征、衰减关系、持时和加速度反应谱等方面进行分析,结果表明:观测记录的峰值加速度等值线长轴沿SW-NE方向展布,与真实的烈度等值线格局基本一致;水平向峰值加速度值与中国东部地区地震动衰减关系预测值基本相符,水平向峰值加速度值和水平向峰值速度值均高于第五代区划图(GB18306-2015)中使用的衰减关系预测值;回归分析了2种地震动相对持时的空间变化曲线,与基于NGA强震记录库的全球经验预测曲线相比,此次地震动持时高于预测值;加速度反应谱峰值周期在0. 1~0. 3s之间,与相应地区基于中国东部地区水平向基岩加速度反应谱衰减关系计算得到的基岩反应谱的形状和峰值周期相比,几个典型加速度记录的反应谱峰值周期相对较小,但反应谱形状大致相似;采用H/V单台谱比法分析了2个典型台站在地震中的场地放大效应,结果表明台站场地对地震动存在明显的放大现象。An M 4.9 earthquake occurred at the junction of Gaoyou and Baoying on July 20,2012.In this paper,43 sets of strong motion records of the main shock are analyzed.With these data,we analyzed the characteristics of the peak ground motion value,attenuation relation,duration and acceleration response spectrum.We draw the peak acceleration contour map of the region near the epicenter.The contour line is smooth and the trend of long axis is northwest-southeast.Distribution of peak acceleration of the observed records is basically consistent with the real intensity distribution.Compared with the predicted result based on the seismic attenuation relation proposed by Yu Yanxiang and Wang Suyunon for eastern China and the Fifth-generation ground motion zonation map,the horizontal PGA and PGV of Gaoyou-Baoying earthquake are higher than the predicted results that are based on the model of Fifth-generation ground motion zonation map,while the PGV is similar with the predicted results which are based on Yu Yanxiang and Wang Suyun s model.We regressively analyzed the spatial-temporal change curves of the two types of relative ground motion durations.Compared with the predicted results proposed by Bommer et al.(2009)based on the NGA strong motion records,the durations of all the three components of this earthquake are higher.10 typical recordings acceleration response spectra with 5%damping are calculated,their peak periods are around 0.1~0.3s.The acceleration response spectrum of the station 32BYT,which has the largest amplitude,is considerably larger than the Chinese code design spectra,while it becomes notably smaller when the period is larger than 0.4s.Compared with the horizontal bedrock acceleration response spectrum predicted by the attenuation relationship for the eastern part of China,the observed response spectrum shape is similar with the predicted ones,while almost all the observed response spectrum values(except station 32YCT)are smaller than the predicted bedrock acceleration response spectrum.These phenomena sugge
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.104.216