检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高全喜[1] GAO Quan-xi(KoGuan School of Law,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China)
出 处:《现代法学》2019年第1期58-74,共17页Modern Law Science
摘 要:当前需要从法学的视角对人类正在进入的虚拟世界给予一种前瞻性的理论分析。传统人类中心主义的法理学对于虚拟世界的理解和法律规制的方法论认为目前大量实施的对于虚拟网络世界的法律规制只具有有限的意义,并没有契合虚拟世界的本质特性。虚拟世界对于传统法律的全新挑战,揭示了虚拟世界的法律化问题之症结点,指出了传统法理学难以应对虚拟世界的理论困境和实践短板。应在去人类中心主义的多维复合的多中心主义的思维框架下,理解虚拟世界的自适与极化的法律化特征,探索一种从人类中心主义到去人类中心主义的法律机制之转型的可能性路径。Nowadays we need to make a theoretical analysis of the virtual world invented by humans from a jurisprudential perspective.This essay,firstly,discusses the understanding of the virtual world based on jurisprudential anthropocentrism,and the pluses and minuses of the legal regulation methodology.The outcome of this discussion is that the present theory of legal regulation to the virtual world has missed the point of the substance of the virtual world,thus its meaning is limited.Secondly,this essay analyses the entirely new challenges of the virtual world to traditional laws,and reveals the matter the two perspectives and their respective evolutions of AI and of Cyber-space-time.The outcome of this discussion is that traditional jurisprudence can hardly handle the virtual world and its practical problems.Finally,this essay presents a methodology of moderate skepticism,tries to form a framework of poly-centered multi-dimensioned un-anthropocentrism,so as to reveal the legal characteristics of self-adapting and polarization of the virtual world.Then we hope a transformation of legal institutions from anthropocentrism to un-anthropocentrism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28