检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋建晓[1] Song Jianxiao(Putian University,Putian 351100,China)
机构地区:[1]莆田学院,福建莆田351100
出 处:《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第1期15-21,共7页Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金项目"政策工具视角下的古代政府治理思想及其当代价值研究"(17BGL223)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:明代海外贸易时禁时弛,对后世影响深远,因此对明代海外贸易的研究历来备受关注。本文围绕明代海外贸易的政策,着重比较分析了禁止海外贸易派和有限制地开展海外贸易派的主要观点,认为开放海外贸易不仅是历史的必然,也是民众的利益所在,不能因为安全问题而禁止海外贸易。在此基础上,本文阐述了明代海外贸易弛禁政策对"一带一路"建设的启示,主要是处理好开放与安全、合作与共享、政府与市场的关系。In the Ming Dynasty,overseas trade was sometimes banned and sometimes liberalized,which had a far-reaching impact on later generations.Therefore,the study of overseas trade in Ming Dynasty has always been concerned.The article makes an analysis of the overseas trade policies in the Ming Dynasty with a focus on the comparison of two major parties:those who advocated banning overseas trade and those who argued for limited overseas trade.The author finds that open overseas trade is not only a historical necessity,but also for the interests of the people,and never prohibits overseas trade because of security issues.On this basis,the author proceeds to explain the implications of the two kinds of overseas trade policies in the Ming Dynasty for the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative,mainly to deal with the relationship between opening-up and security,cooperation and sharing,government and market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229