超声造影在胃间质瘤诊断中的价值  

Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors

作　　者：邱伟[1] 张灌生[1] 周密[1] 陈曙蓓 李明星 QIU Wei;ZHANG Guansheng;ZHOU Mi;CHEN Shubei;LI Mingxing(Department of Ultrasound,the First People,s Hospital of Neijiang,Neijiang 641000,Sichuan Province China;Department of Gastroenterology,the Second People's Hospital of Neijiang;Department of Ultrasound,the Affiliated Hospital,Southwest Medical University)

机构地区：[1]内江市第一人民医院超声科,四川内江641000 [2]内江市第二人民医院消化内科 [3]西南医科大学附属医院超声科

出　　处：《西南医科大学学报》2019年第1期74-76,80,共4页Journal of Southwest Medical University

摘　　要：目的:探讨超声造影在胃间质瘤诊断中的价值。方法:回顾性分析接受常规超声检查与超声造影检查的16例胃间质瘤患者的临床资料。所有病例均经手术病理证实。比较常规超声与超声造影对胃间质瘤诊断的正确率、定位准确率。结果:超声造影诊断率(93.7%)高于常规超声诊断率(43.7%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=9.309,P=0.006)。超声造影对胃间质瘤的定位诊断正确率(81.2%)高于常规超声的定位诊断正确率(31.2%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.127,P=0.011)。结论:超声造影对胃间质瘤的诊断正确率及定位诊断正确率皆优于常规超声。Objective:To investigate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors.Methods:The clinical data of 16 patients with gastric stromal tumors were analyzed retrospectively.These patients had undergone both conventional ultrasound examination(CU)and CEUS.All cases were confirmed by surgical pathology.The two methods were compared in terms of the accuracy of localization and diagnosis.Results:Of all patients,93.7%were diagnosed with gastric stromal tumors by CEUS,and 43.7%by CU,with a significant difference in diagnostic rate between the two methods(P=0.006).There was also a significant difference in localization accuracy between CEUS and CU(81.2%vs 31.2%,P=0.011).Conclusion:CEUS is better than CU regarding the accuracy of diagnosis and localization of gastric stromal tumors.

关 键 词：胃 超声造影 胃间质瘤 

分 类 号：R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]