《献血法》与相关法律法规的对比研究  

A Comparison of The Blood Donation Law With Other related Regulations

作　　者：田耘博[1] 冯凌 赵生银 张洪斌[4] 陆小军 李伍升 崔欣 蒋绪亮 林毅胜 何广文 丁恒 刘亚欣 谌凤萍[13] 任爱民[13] 邱艳[13] TIAN Yun-bo;FENG Ling;ZHAO Shengyin(Chongqing Blood Center,Chongqing 400015)

机构地区：[1]重庆市血液中心 [2]云南昆明血液中心 [3]宁夏回族自治区血液中心 [4]乌鲁木齐市血液中心 [5]南京血液中心 [6]河南血液中心 [7]贵州血液中心 [8]淄博中心血站 [9]泉州中心血站 [10]赤峰市中心血站 [11]红河哈尼族彝族自治州中心血站 [12]包头中心血站 [13]北京市红十字血液中心

出　　处：《临床输血与检验》2019年第1期92-95,共4页Journal of Clinical Transfusion and Laboratory Medicine

摘　　要：本文将《献血法》与其他相关法律法规、标准及文件内容进行逐条比对,梳理与其同位法不一致或下位法与其相抵触的内容。对无偿献血者的年龄规定、无偿献血的宣传教育、献血量和间隔期、剩余成分血浆处理、临床急救用血和应急血液供应、非法采集血液的处罚、经血疾病传播的处罚、工作人员玩忽职守的处罚等8个方面进行差异对比分析。提出了关于不合格血液的定义、保护献血者隐私、急救送血车的交通特权、采供血从业医务人员职业暴露处理等4个问题,需要在我国输血法规体系完善中考虑进一步规范的建议。希望研究结果能为修订完善我国采供血法规体系提供参考,促进无偿献血工作的健康发展,持续满足人民卫生健康事业发展的需要。Objective This article compares the Blood Donation Law with other relevant laws and regulations and analyzes the inconsistencies or conflicting contents among them.The differences were found with age regulation of voluntary blood donors,publicity and education of voluntary blood donation,donation volume and time of intervals,treatments of surplus plasma,emergency blood usage and blood supply,punishments due to illegal blood collection,transfusion-transmitted infectious diseases,and dereliction of duty,etc.Suggestions were given to the blood collection and supply regulation system in the country,including the definition of unqualified blood products,protection of the privacy of blood donors,transportation privilege of first-aid blood delivery vehicles,and the occupational exposure treatments of medical personnel engaged in blood collection and preparation so as to to promote the sustained and stable development of voluntary blood donation and meet the needs for the development for health care.

关 键 词：献血法 法律法规 对比研究 

分 类 号：R19-0[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]