检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周秀娟[1] 王宇涛 ZHOU Xiu-juan;WANG Yu-tao(Changchun University of Science and Technology Changchun 130022 China)
机构地区:[1]长春理工大学,长春130022
出 处:《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》2019年第1期62-68,共7页Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:作为私募股权互联网化创始国家的美国,在2015年通过了《Jobs法案》的第三部分,针对股权众筹监管进行了制度创新,一方面,《Jobs法案》第三部分打破了传统的合格投资人、投资人数量、融资额度等融资方面的限制,突显互联网+时代股权众筹的便捷性、普惠性与灵活性;另一方面,通过对初创企业的融资上限、投资人投资上限、股权众筹平台的权利义务的设定,更加全面严谨地对投资人的权益进行法律保护。论文对《Jobs法案》第三部分进行详细解读,特别是对《Jobs法案》第三部分实施前后的股权众筹监管制度做对比分析,评析《Jobs法案》第三部分的监管优势,以期对我国股权众筹监管法律制度的完善提供参考。As the founding country of private equity,the United States adopted the third part of the Jobs Act in 2015,which made institutional innovation for the regulation of equity-based crowdfunding.On the one hand,the third part of the Jobs Act broke the restriction of traditional qualified investors,the number of investors and the financing amount,which highlighted the convenience,universality and flexibility of the equity-based crowdfunding in the Internet+era.On the other hand,through setting the start-up financing limit,the upper limit of investment,and the rights and obligations of the raised platform equity,a more comprehensively and strictly legal protection of the rights and interests of investors were done.The paper gives a detailed interpretation of the third part of the Jobs Act.In particular,it makes a comparative analysis of the regulatory system of equity-based crowdfunding before and after the implementation of the third part of the Jobs Act.Furthermore,it analyzes the regulatory advantages of the third part of the Jobs Act,in order to provide a reference for the improvement of the legal system of equitybased crowdfunding supervision in our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117