检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵漓波 胡文山 张群[2] 林峰[1] ZHAO Li-Bo;HU Wen-Shan;ZHANG Qun;LIN Feng(Department of Orthopedics,Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Sanya 572000,China;Department of Orthopedics,the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China)
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院海南医院骨科,三亚572000 [2]解放军总医院第一医学中心骨科,北京100853
出 处:《中华老年多器官疾病杂志》2019年第1期21-25,共5页Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly
摘 要:目的对比骨搬运和抗生素骨水泥结合膜诱导技术治疗胫骨开放性骨折后感染性骨不连老年患者的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2013年5月至2016年5月解放军总医院海南医院和解放军总医院第一临床医学中心骨科收治的胫骨开放性骨折后感染性骨不连老年患者72例,研究组和对照组各36例,研究组患者给予骨搬运技术治疗,对照组患者给予抗生素骨水泥结合膜诱导技术治疗。随访12个月,对比2组患者的对位对线情况、骨愈合指数、美国膝关节协会(AKS)膝关节功能评分、Baird-Jackson踝关节功能评分和临床疗效。应用SPSS 19.0统计软件对数据进行分析。组间比较采用t检验或χ~2检验。结果 2组患者的年龄、性别及骨折位置等差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组相比于对照组,手术时间缩短[(135±17) vs(146±12)min],AKS膝关节功能评分[(165.7±15.2) vs (123.7±18.1)]和Baird-Jackson踝关节功能评分[(88.6±3.6) vs(77.6±5.4)]提高,骨愈合指数[(42.0±2.0) vs (43.3±3.0)d/cm]降低,临床有效率高[61.1%(22/36) vs 47.2%(17/36)],感染发生率低[5.6%(2/36) vs 25.0%(9/36)],差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论骨搬运技术能够促进胫骨开放性骨折后感染性骨不连老年患者的功能康复,值得临床推广。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of bone transport with antibiotic bone cement combined with membrane induction in the treatment of infectious nonunion after open tibial fracture in the elderly.Methods A retrospective study was performed on 72 elderly patients with infectious nonunion after open tibial fractures who admitted to our 2 Orthopedic Departments from May 2013 to May 2016.According to the treatment,they were assigned into study group(n=36,bone transport)and control group(n=36,antibiotic bone cement combined with membrane induction).All the patients were followed up for 12 months.The contralateral alignment,bone healing index,American Knee Society(AKS)score for knee function,Baird-Jackson score of ankle function and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.The data were analyzed by SPSS statistics 19.0 software.Chi-square test or Student′s t test was used for the comparison between the 2 groups.Results There was no significant differences in age,sex and fracture location between the 2 groups(P>0.05).The study group had significantly shorter operation time[(135±17)vs(146±12)min],higher AKS score[(165.7±15.2)vs(123.7±18.1)]and Baird-Jackson score[(88.6±3.6)vs(77.6±5.4)]and lower bone healing index[(42.0±2.0)vs(43.3±3.0)d/cm],better clinical efficacy[61.1%(22/36)vs 47.2%(17/36)],and lower incidence of infection[5.6%(2/36)vs 25.0%(9/36)]when compared with the control group(all P<0.05).Conclusion Bone transport technique can promote the functional recovery in the elderly patients with infectious nonunion after open tibial fracture,and it is worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112