检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘忠 Liu Zhong(Nan Chang Normal University,Nanchang 330032)
机构地区:[1]南昌师范学院,南昌330032
出 处:《情报杂志》2019年第1期19-22,共4页Journal of Intelligence
基 金:南昌师范学院11531工程培育学科(马克思主义理论)资助项目研究成果之一;南昌师范学院博士科研基金项目"中国古代兵学文化研究"(编号:NSBSJJ2018007)
摘 要:[目的/意义]作为中国古代兵学经典的两部代表性著作,《孙子》和《吴子》都有很丰富的情报思想,深入研究挖掘相关内容对于加深理论认识、指导现实情报工作实践两方面具有较大的价值。[方法/过程]采取文本对比分析法,从情报观、情报搜集、情报分析和保密四个方面对两部兵学经典进行对比研究,重点阐述两者在唯物主义的情报认识论、实用主义的情报观、情报搜集研判方法和对保密的思想认识等方面的相同点和不同点。[结果/结论]总体上来看,孙吴的情报思想既有论述内容和侧重点方面的区别,又互有补充相得益彰,唯物主义的价值观和方法论是两者共同的思想支撑,也是我国传统兵学情报思想的精髓。[Purpose/Significance]As two representative works of ancient Chinese military classics,sun tzu and wu zi both have rich intelligence thoughts.In-depth study and exploration of relevant contents are of great value for deepening theoretical understanding and guiding practical intelligence work.[Method/Process]Take text comparison analysis method,this paper from the view of intelligence,intelligence gathering,intelligence analysis and intelligence confidential four aspects of two classic art of comparison research,emphasis on both intelligence in materialism epistemology,pragmatic view of intelligence,intelligence gathering analysis method and the similarities and differences in thinking and understanding of confidentiality.[Result/Conclusion]On the whole,the two intelligence thoughts are not only different in content and emphasis,but also complementary to each other.Materialist values and methodology are the common ideological support of the two and the essence of China's traditional thoughts on military intelligence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15