检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张丽霞 王竞[1] 殷红慧[1] 顾毓敏[2] 徐天养[1] 李大肥[1] 卢晓华[2] 张传树[1] 侯小东[3] 陆富芝 ZHANG Li-xia;WANG Jing;YIN Hong-hui(Wenshan Company,Yunnan Tobacco Company,Wenshan,Yunnan 663000)
机构地区:[1]云南省烟草公司文山州公司,云南文山663000 [2]上海烟草集团有限责任公司,上海200082 [3]中国农业科学院烟草研究所,山东青岛266101
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2019年第2期188-190,共3页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:中国烟草总公司云南省公司科技项目(2017YN26)
摘 要:[目的]筛选烟叶均质化评价中数据处理方法。[方法]对比变异系数法、方差分析法和数据标准化后方差分析3种方法,通过对文山州烟叶质量进行均质性评价,分析3种方法的优缺点。[结果]变异系数法简单快速,但无法比较大小,也无法判断偏离方法;方差分析法可以克服变异系数法的缺点,但受干扰太多;数据标准化后方差分析法,可以克服上述方法的缺点。3种方法中变异系数法的评价方法与其他2种方法差别较大;方差分析法和数据标准化后方差分析法评价结果基本一致稍有不同。[结论]数据标准化方差分析法可以作为烟叶均值性的评价方法。[Objective]The research aimed to screen data processing methods in tobacco leaves homogenization evaluation.[Method]This study compared the three methods of variation coefficient,variance analysis and standardized post variance analysis,and the advantages and disadvantages of the three methods were analyzed by comparing the evaluation of homogeneity of tobacco leaves quality in Wenshan.[Result]The variation coefficient method was simple and fast,but it could not compare the size and could not judge the deviation method;variance analysis method could overcome the shortcomings of the variation coefficient method,but was too much interference;standardized post variance analysis could overcome the shortcomings of the above methods.The evaluation method of the variation coefficient method was quite different from the other methods,and variance analysis method and standardized post variance analysis were basically consistent and slightly different.[Conclusion]Standardized post variance analysis can be used as an evaluation method for homogenization of tobacco leaves.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3