检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余自娟 张艳[1] 张倍倍 张慧颖[1] 王荣华[1] 李宏洁 赵敬 杜灿灿 YU Zijuan;ZHANG Yan;ZHANG Beibei;ZHANG Huiying;WANG Ronghua;LI Hongjie;ZHAO Jing;DU Cancan(College of Nursing,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450051,China)
机构地区:[1]郑州大学护理学院,郑州450001
出 处:《重庆医学》2019年第2期266-269,共4页Chongqing medicine
基 金:第58批中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2015M582208)
摘 要:目的汉化护理信息能力自评量表(SANICS)并检验其信效度。方法严格按照Brislin模型对SANICS进行翻译与回译、文化调适及预试验,形成中文版SANICS。后在124名在读护理硕士研究生中评价SANICS的信效度。结果中文版SANICS总量表Cronbach′sα系数为0.931,重测信度为0.883,内容效度0.950;提取5个公因子,每个条目在其公因子上的载荷值均大于0.4,累计贡献率70.659%。结论中文版SANICS具有良好的信效度。Objective To check the reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Self-Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies Scale(SANICS).Methods SANICS was translated and back translated,culturally adapted and pre-tested in strict accordance with Brislin model to form Chinese version of SANICS.The reliability and validity were evaluated in 124 postgraduate nursing students.Results The Cronbach′sαvalues of Chinese version of SANICS was 0.931,and the retest reliability was 0.883,the content validity was 0.950.Five common factors were extracted and each item had a load value of >0.4 on its common factor.The accumulative rate was 70.659%.Conclusion The Chinese version of SANICS had good reliability and validity.
分 类 号:R331[医药卫生—人体生理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229