检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:归泳涛[1] Gui Yongtao
机构地区:[1]北京大学国际关系学院
出 处:《日本学刊》2019年第1期45-70,共26页Japanese Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目"日本‘军事崛起’与我国对策研究"(编号:17AGJ009)
摘 要:近年来,美日两国与中国在东海和南海问题上的竞争日益突显,但又控制在军事冲突的门槛之下,形成了所谓的"灰色地带"之争。在这一过程中,美国倾向于采取直接行动制衡中国,日本则首先致力于改革国内体制和提升自身能力;美国更重视秩序之争,日本则聚焦于主权之争,这导致两国在利益和政策上出现分歧。"灰色地带"之争已成为中美日博弈的一种新形式,今后可能长期持续下去。中国应该就此提出自己的概念,并围绕案例展开更深入的理论和对策研究。The confrontation in the East and South China Seas between the United States and Japan on one side and China on the other has become increasingly salient in the past few years.Such confrontation remains below the threshold of military conflict,and thus is categorized as a form of gray-zone competition.While the United States takes direct actions to contain China,Japan prioritizes domestic institutional reforms and capacity building.The former stresses the competition for order,whereas the latter focuses on the competition for sovereignty,which has caused divergence of interests and policies between the two countries.The Gray-zone competition has become a new form of U.S.-Japan engagement with China,and is likely to continue in the long run.China should advance its own concept and promote theoretical and policy research based on case studies in that regard.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222