检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴荣荣 王红宇[2] 李俊伟[2] 白敏聪[3] 朱映红[1] 包杰[1] Wu Rong-rong;Wang Hong-yu;Li Jun-wei;Bai Min-cong;Zhu Ying-hong;Bao Jie(Department of Cardiac Function Examination, Eastern Hospital District, the Second People s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang Jiangsu 222000;Department of ECG Diagnosis, the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan Shanxi 030001;Department of Electrocardiogram, Tongmei Group General Hospital, Datong Shanxi 037003, China)
机构地区:[1]连云港市第二人民医院东院区心功能检查科,江苏连云港222000 [2]山西医科大学第二医院心电诊断科,山西太原030001 [3]同煤集团总医院心电图科,山西大同037003
出 处:《实用心电学杂志》2019年第1期49-52,共4页Journal of Practical Electrocardiology
摘 要:目的分析急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)患者心电图复极相关参数的变化情况,并评估其对胸痛患者临床综合评估的指导作用。方法选取93例经冠状动脉造影证实的AMI患者(AMI组),同时选取年龄、性别与之匹配的正常对照组82例。比较两组心电图肢体导联和胸导联复极相关参数。结果 AMI组肢体导联QT间期、QTc间期和T波时间明显高于正常对照组[(387. 4±36. 9) ms vs.(370. 0±24. 7) ms;(422. 8±35. 6) ms vs.(405. 0±23. 0) ms;(174. 4±26. 8) ms vs.(167. 0±11. 0) ms],且差异均有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。胸导联QT间期、QTc间期和T波时间也明显高于正常对照组[(399. 3±44. 6) ms vs.(368. 9±24. 0) ms;(435. 0±37. 5) ms vs.(404. 2±23. 1) ms;(195. 0±30. 9) ms vs.(174. 9±12. 1) ms],且差异均有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论 AMI患者心电图复极时间延长。心电图复极相关参数的变化对胸痛患者的临床综合评估有一定的指导作用。Objective To analyze the change of indexes related to ECG repolarization in the patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI), and to judge its instruction for clinical comprehensive evaluation in the patients with chest pain. Methods Ninety-three patients with AMI confirmed by coronary angiography were selected as AMI group while 82 normal controls were simultaneously selected. Cases and controls were matched in age and sex. The indexes related to repolarization in limb and chest leads were compared between the two groups. Results In the AMI group, the QT interval, QTc interval and T wave duration in limb leads were significantly higher than those in the control group[(387.4±36.9) ms vs.(370.0±24.7) ms;(422.8±35.6) ms vs.(405.0±23.0) ms;(174.4±26.8) ms vs.(167.0±11.0) ms] with statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05);the index values in chest leads were also significantly higher[(399.3±44.6) ms vs.(368.9±24.0) ms;(435.0±37.5) ms vs.(404.2±23.1) ms;(195.0±30.9) ms vs.(174.9±12.1) ms] with statistically significant differences( P <0.05). Conclusion The repolarization time is prolonged on the ECG of AMI patients. Variation of repolarization-related indexes are instructive for clinical comprehensive evaluation in the patients with chest pain.
分 类 号:R542.22[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3