检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱瑞 王伟[1] ZHU Rui;WANG Wei(Hemodialysis Room,Huaihe Hospital of Henan University,Kaifeng 475000,Henan Province,China)
机构地区:[1]河南大学淮河医院血液透析室,河南开封475000
出 处:《罕少疾病杂志》2018年第6期51-53,共3页Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases
摘 要:目的研究行为阶段护理干预对血液透析患者自我效能及不良事件的影响。方法选择2015年5月至2016年5月在我院进行血液透析的100例患者进行研究,运用双盲法将所有研究患者分为对照组(n=50)和观察组(n=50)。对照组患者采取常规护理方式,观察组患者采取行为阶段护理进行护理干预。对比分析两组患者的自我效能以及不良事件发生率。结果护理后,观察组患者的遵医行为、药物治疗、日常生活以及健康行为评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组患者不良事件的概率14%显著高于观察组4%,差异具有统计学意义P<0.05。结论运用行为阶段护理干预对血液透析患者进行护理有利于降低患者内萎大声不良时间的概率,提升患者的自我效能,值得在临床进行推广。Objective Research the effect of behavioral nursing intervention on hemodialysis patients'self-efficacy and adverse events.Methods 100 patients who underwent hemodialysis in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2016 were selected for the study.All the patients were divided into control group(n=50)and observation group(n=50)by doubleblind method.The control group received routine nursing and the observation group received behavioral nursing for nursing intervention.The self-efficacy and incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.Results After nursing care,the scores of medical behavior,drug treatment,daily life and health behavior of the patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).The probability of adverse events was 14%higher in the control group than 4%in the observation group,and the difference was statistically significantof(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of behavioral nursing intervention in hemodialysis patients can reduce the probability of adverse time of impotence and improve the self-efficacy of patients,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28