检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:饶舜禹 RAO Shun-yu(School of Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出 处:《唐山学院学报》2019年第1期37-44,共8页Journal of Tangshan University
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDC016)
摘 要:现今行贿犯罪立法显现出构成要件要素冗余、刑罚结构失衡、刑罚厉度不足等特性,无不表明我国的行贿犯罪治理深受消极治理主义影响。有限的司法资源面对不可估量的行贿犯罪黑数和存量,已呈捉襟见肘之势。为打破治理效果疲弱之僵局,学界涌现出截然不同的观点流派,一是倡导行贿犯罪出罪化与免责化,二是以积极治理主义为指导惩治行贿犯罪。审慎取舍的积极治理主义的主张,对未来行贿犯罪立法体系建构意义非凡。The current legislation on bribery crimes shows the characteristics of redundant elements,unbalanced penal structure and insufficient penalties,which reflect that the governance of bribery crimes in China is deeply affected by negative managerialism.The limited judicial resources become hard up for the immeasurable amount of bribery crimes and its stocks.In order to break the stalemate of the weak governance,the academic circles have produced different perspectives.One is to advocate the decriminalization and exemption from criminal penalty of bribery crimes,and the other is to punish bribery crimes under the guidance of active managerialism.The prudent choice of active managerialism is of great significance to the construction of the future bribery criminal legislation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3