检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛永慧 Xue Yonghui
机构地区:[1]两岸关系和平发展协同创新中心,福建厦门361005 [2]厦门大学台湾研究中心,福建厦门361005
出 处:《台湾研究集刊》2019年第1期54-65,共12页Taiwan Research Journal
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"新形势下维护两岸关系和平发展的法治路径研究"(17JJDGAT001)
摘 要:大陆司法责任制改革的趋势是构建与台湾相同的法官职务监督模式,即在传统的以审级和考评/考绩监督为主的内部监督机制之外,建立以追责和惩戒为内容的外部监督机制。被誉为新一轮司法改革"牛鼻子"的完善司法责任制改革,目前仍面临如何处理法官职务监督与审判独立的关系、如何看待法官责任追究机制的功能与作用、追究何种法官责任、由谁追究以及如何追究法官责任等难题。台湾法官个案评鉴制度的规范内容及其在实践运行中的成败得失,可为大陆司法责任制改革提供启示与借鉴。The trend of the judicial responsibility system reform in the mainland is to construct the same judicial post supervision mode as Taiwan. This means that,in addition to the traditional internal supervision mechanism which is based on the peer review and the evaluation/performance supervision,an external supervision mechanism with accountability investigation and punishment as its content should be established. The new round of the reform of the judicial accountability system is still faced with such problems as how to deal with the relationship between the judge’s position supervision and the trial independent,how to judge the function and role of the judge’s accountability mechanism,what kind of judicial accountability should be investigated,who should look into the judicial accountability,and how the judicial accountability should be investigated. Therefore,The rules of judge’s case evaluation system in Taiwan and its practical experience can provide enlightenment for the reform of judicial accountability system in mainland.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43