检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张玲[1] Zhang Ling
机构地区:[1]南开大学法学院
出 处:《知识产权》2019年第2期28-43,共16页Intellectual Property
基 金:南开大学重点学科骨干人才资助项目"知识产权侵权损害赔偿救济制度研究"
摘 要:研读我国保护作品完整权的判决书后发现,法官的裁判标准各异,存在同案异判现象,权利规则需要在反思后予以完善。作者声誉不属于著作权保护的精神利益,应回归人格权保护范畴。保护作品完整性的体系价值在于:确保作品的同一性,即表达信息的完整性和思想与表达的一致性。应取消修改权,将误读的含义归还保护作品完整权。侵害保护作品完整权的行为方式包括:作品文本的改动和作品文本之外的改动;侵权判定标准的基点由作者声誉回归作品本体,并以社会公众作为判断的主体标准。Chinese judicial decisions concerning the protection of the right of integrity expose varied trial standard by judges, which leads to like cases with difference judgment. The rules on the right of integrity need to be refined upon reflection. The author’s reputation should be part of personality right instead of spiritual interests of copyright. The value of the right system is to ensure the identity of works, meaning the consistency between the integrity of expressed information and the expressed thoughts. The alteration right should be cancelled, and the concept of "misunderstanding" falls into the scope of the right of integrity. The infringement behaviors include the changes made to and beyond the text of the work. The infringement judgment standard should be based on the work itself rather than the author’s reputation;the public should be made the subject of the judgment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15