论法官知法原则在商标行政纠纷中的适用  

On the iura novit curia Doctrine and its Application in Trademark Administrative Disputes

作　　者：尹腊梅[1] Yin Lamei

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学

出　　处：《知识产权》2019年第2期53-57,共5页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：法官知法原则作为近现代民事诉讼法上一项隐形的基本原则,在法律释明与适用等制度建构中发挥着重要影响。商标行政机关居中裁判、行政诉讼全面审查原则以及现行商标法各条文之间适用界限的不明确性,决定了法官知法原则具有较大的适用空间。应当在考虑公共利益与私权划分理论的基础上,对商标异议和无效的事由作类型化区分,并据此对裁判者主动释明和援引的权力及义务作类型化处理。As an invisible basic principle in modern civil procedural law, the iura novit curia doctrine plays an important role in the institutional construction of legal interpretation and application. The intermediate judgment by trademark administrative organs, the principle of comprehensive review of administrative litigation, and the obscurity of the application boundaries between different provisions of the current Trademark Law render the iura novit curia doctrine large room for application. It is recommended to carry out typological distinction between the causes of trademark opposition and invalidation on the theoretical basis of public interests and private rights division, and accordingly to decide whether the referees should actively clarify and apply the law involved.

关 键 词：法官知法 商标 行政审查 行政诉讼 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]