生态环境损害民刑诉讼衔接的顺位规则研究  

Study on Rule of Order in Link between Civil Litigation and Criminal Proceeding for Ecological Environment Damage

作　　者：汪劲[1] 马海桓 WANG Jin;MA Haiheng

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第1期25-34,111,共11页Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：环境保护部环境规划院2017年生态损害赔偿项目"生态环境损害赔偿与行政刑事手段衔接立法研究"

摘　　要：造成生态环境损害的行为同时具有民事违法以及刑事违法双重属性,生态损害索赔诉讼与关联刑事诉讼的有效衔接对生态环境损害赔偿制度目的的实现具有重要影响。采用先刑后民与刑民并行模式处理生态环境损害民刑诉讼衔接问题存在弊端,一方面不利于生态环境及时修复,另一方面也不利于赔偿义务人积极履行生态环境修复义务。采用先民后刑模式则可以有效避免上述弊端,是处理生态环境损害民刑诉讼衔接的最优方案,同时还需要建立健全环境行政与司法的联动机制,保障先民后刑模式的顺利施行。The behaviors that cause ecological environmental damage have both civil and criminal offences,so the effective link between the litigation of compensation for damage of ecological environment and related environmental criminal proceeding has an important impact on realizing the purpose of compensation for environmental damage.There are drawbacks in both criminal proceeding priority and the mode of civil litigation and criminal proceedings in parallel in dealing with the connection in ecological damage claim.On the one hand,it is not conducive to the timely restoration of the ecological environment.On the other hand,it is also detrimental for the indemnification obligor to fulfill the obligation of restoring ecological environment.It is an effective way to avoid the above drawbacks by applying the mode of civil litigation priority,which is the best in dealing with the connection of civil litigation and criminal proceeding in ecological damage claim.At the same time,it is necessary to establish and improve the linkage mechanism between environmental administration and justice to ensure the successful implementation of the mode.

关 键 词：生态损害索赔诉讼 环境刑事诉讼 民刑衔接 顺位规则 

分 类 号：D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]