检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:俞峰 孙卫东[1] 郑永志[1,2] YU Feng;SUN Weidong;ZHENG Yongzhi(PLA 113rd Hospital,Ningbo 315040,China)
机构地区:[1]解放军第113医院 [2]解放军92602部队医院
出 处:《中外医学研究》2019年第5期25-27,共3页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:探讨右美托咪定在内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用价值。方法:129例拟行内镜黏膜下剥离术的患者,采用随机数字表法平均分为三组,对照组(A组)采用单用丙泊酚麻醉,研究组(B组)采用右美托咪定[0.2μg/(kg·h)]复合丙泊酚麻醉,研究组(C组)采用右美托咪定[0.3μg/(kg·h)]复合丙泊酚麻醉。术后评估麻醉效果,比较麻醉时间、手术时间及苏醒时间,各组的丙泊酚用量,以及不良反应发生情况等。结果:与A组比较,研究组的麻醉效果较优(P<0.05),但B组、C组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);各组患者麻醉时间、手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组C组的苏醒时间明显长于A组和B组(P<0.05),同时A组和B组的苏醒时间相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与A组比较,研究组的丙泊酚用量显著低于对照组(P<0.05),但B组、C组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B组不良反应发生率最低(P<0.05)。结论:在内镜黏膜下剥离术中采用右美托咪定[0.2μg/(kg·h)]复合丙泊酚的麻醉方式,可以为手术操作提供理想的麻醉效果,减少丙泊酚用量,减少不良反应,是安全有效的麻醉方法。Objective:To investigate the application of Dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD).Method:129 patients in need of ESD in our hospital were selected.They were randomly divided into control group A(injected with only Propofol),study group B[injected with Propofol and low-dose Dexmedetomidine 0.2μg/(kg·h)]and study group C[injected with Propofol and low-dose Dexmedetomidine 0.3μg/(kg·h)].The analgesia effects,analgesia time,operative time,wake up time,the dose of propofol and adverse reactions were recorded in the 24 h after the treatment.Result:Compared with group A,the analgesia effects in group B and group C were better with statistically significant(P<0.05).However there was no statistically significant differences between group B and group C(P>0.05).Compared with group C,the wake up time in group A and group B were longer with statistically significant(P<0.05).However there was no statistically significant differences between group A and group B(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in analgesia time and operative time(P>0.05).The wake up time of group C was significantly longer than that of group A and group B(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between group A and group B(P>0.05).Compared with group A,the dose of Propofol in group B,group C were lower with statistically significant(P<0.05).However there was no statistically significant differences between group B and group C(P>0.05).The adverse reactions in group B were significantly lower than that in group A and group C(P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of Propofol and low-dose Dexmedetomidine[2μg/(kg·h)]is safe and effective in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection.It also can reduce the the dose of Propofol and improve the satisfaction of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.100.166