行政判决类型化修法路径之不足与改进  

Inadequacy and Improvement of the Path of the Administrative Judgment Categorization Modification

作　　者：廖吕有 Liao Luyou(Law School. China University of Political Science and Law. Beijing 100088. China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《天津大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第2期106-113,共8页Journal of Tianjin University：Social Sciences

摘　　要：全国人大常委会在《行政诉讼法》的修法中选择了行政判决类型化的修法路径,试图通过行政判决类型化达到行政诉讼类型化的效果。行政判决类型化虽然有一定的积极作用,但仅仅立足于行政判决,缺乏行政诉讼类型化般的大局观,无法实现行政诉讼的科学化和精细化,难以实现保护行政相对人权益和监督行政机关依法行政的立法目标。反之,行政诉讼类型化的科学性与精细性则可以保障实现《行政诉讼法》的立法目标。未来,行政诉讼应当实现由行政判决类型化向行政诉讼类型化的进化。The Standing Committee of the National People,s Congress chose the path of administrative judgment categorization modification in the amendments to the Administrative Litigation Law,trying to achieve the effect of the administrative litigation categorization by the administrative judgment categorization.Although the administrative judgment categorization has a certain positive effect,it is only based on administrative judgments,and lacks the overall situation of the administrative litigation,which causes it to be unable to make a scientific and refined administrative litigation,and to be difficult to achieve the aims of the law--protecting citizen rights and supervising the government.On the contrary,the scientificity and precision of administrative litigation categorization can guarantee the realization of the legislative goals of the Administrative Procedure Law.In the future,administrative litigation should evolve from the administrative judgment categorization to the administrative litigation categorization.

关 键 词：行政判决类型化 行政诉讼类型化 行政诉讼 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]