以《防震减灾法》第36条为例拷辩国家标准的衔接问题  

Study on cohesion in national standards illustrated by the example of《Law of the People's Republic of China on protecting against and mitigating earthquake disasters》 article 36

作　　者：郎爱云[1] Lang Aiyun(Institute of Disaster Prevention,Yanjiao,Hebei 065201,China)

机构地区：[1]防灾科技学院,河北燕郊065201

出　　处：《国际地震动态》2019年第2期22-31,共10页Recent Developments in World Seismology

摘　　要：衔接不仅有相合和互含之义,还有上下和主次之分,与衔接相关的法律规范和各种规范性文本中不同的表达方式,也使衔接的意思层次趋于复杂,如果不能加以明确,会直接影响法的权威、国家标准的执行和规范性文件的实效,甚至影响行政相对人的权利行使。通过对《防震减灾法》第36条作深入分析,发现解决标准衔接的实际问题,需推动标准化改革,需要完善法律责任条款、选择合适的衔接表达方式、运用成熟的立法技巧、合理确定国家标准的地位、充分保障行政相对人的权利,等等。The term “cohesion” does not only mean that two parallel elements at issue are in agreement and mutually compatible,but may also mean that all elements in a certain hierarchical system align well and form an integrated whole. Due to the highly variable and complicated ways of expressing a certain concept that are often involved in legal and other normative texts,proper definition of this term is all the more tricky. Ambiguities in the meaning of this concept will pose directly negative impacts on the authority of laws,execution of national standards,actual result of normative documents,and even administrative person's right of enforcement. Through the in-depth analysis on 《Law of the People's Republic of China on protecting against and mitigating earthquake disasters》 article 36,the writer argues that,to solve the practical problems on cohesion in standards,it includes promoting standardization reform,improving the legal liability,selecting the appropriate expression,using the mature legislative skills,determining reasonably the legal status of the national standard,and protecting fully the rights of administrative person,and so on.

关 键 词：法律衔接 国家标准 抗震设防要求 抗震设计规范 软规定 标准适用 

分 类 号：P315[天文地球—地震学] C65[天文地球—固体地球物理学]