专利侵权中的归责原则及其司法适用——美国3M公司诉山东双球防护器材有限公司侵犯专利权纠纷案  

Imputation Principles and Their Judicial Application in Patent Infringements

作　　者：丁文杰 DING Wenjie(Law School, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200438

出　　处：《中国发明与专利》2019年第3期113-115,共3页China Invention & Patent

基　　金：国家重点研发计划"现代服务业共性关键技术研发及应用示范"重点专项"科技成果与数据资源产权交易技术(2017YFB1401101)"项目课题资助的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：专利法在专利侵权问题上采取的是无过错责任原则。即成立专利侵权不以行为人是否具有故意或过失加以判断。但是,在损害赔偿责任方面,无论是对于制造者还是对于销售者,专利法采取的都是过错责任原则。《专利法》第70条之所以将制造者排除在外,是因为基于专利公开制度的旨趣,制造者比销售者和使用者负有更高的注意义务。The Patent Law adopts the No-fault liability principle for the establishment of patent infringement, which implies that liability for patent infringement is to be established independent of the tortfeasor's intention or negligence. However, in terms of the range of compensation which should be afforded by the manufacturer and seller, the Patent Law adopts the fault liability principle. The reason why the applicable scope of Article 70 of the Patent Law excludes the manufacturer, considering the objective of patent publication system, is that the manufacturer has a higher duty of care than the seller and the user.

关 键 词：专利侵权 专利公开 停止侵权 损害赔偿 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]