检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翁喜娟 邵慧珺 WENG Xi-juan;SHAO Hui-jun(Department of Emergency, Dalian Friendship Hospital, Dalian 116001, China)
机构地区:[1]大连市友谊医院急诊科,116001 [2]大连市友谊医院神经内二科,116001
出 处:《中国现代药物应用》2019年第5期163-164,共2页Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
摘 要:目的探讨对脑卒中后失语患者实施积极语言护理干预的临床意义。方法80例脑卒中后失语患者随机分为试验组和对照组,各40例。对照组采取常规护理干预,试验组在对照组的基础上使用积极语言护理干预,比较两组患者护理干预后的临床效果。结果干预后,试验组临床总有效率为87.5%,明显高于对照组的62.5%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对脑卒中后失语患者实施积极语言护理干预可以提高患者的临床干预效果,提高患者的生活质量,值得在临床推广。Objective To discuss the clinical significance of positive language nursing intervention for patients with aphasia after stroke. Methods A total of 80 patients with aphasia after stroke were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing intervention, and the experimental group received positive language nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The clinical effect after nursing intervention in two groups was compared. Results After intervention, the experimental group had obviously higher clinical total effective rate as 87.5% than 62.5% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Positive language nursing intervention can improve the clinical intervention effect of patients with aphasia after stroke, and improve their quality of life. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15