中国城市基础设施投资效率及其对居民满意度评价的影响——基于CGSS数据的实证研究  

Urban Infrastructure Investment Efficiency and Its Impact on Residents' Satisfaction Evaluation in China: Based on CGSS Data

作　　者：陈治国 杜金华[2] 李成友[3] 辛冲冲 CHEN Zhiguo;DU Jinhua;LI Chengyou;XIN Chongchong(College of Economics and Management,Xianyang Normal University,Xianyang 712000,China;College of Economics,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China;School of Finance,Shandong University of Finance Economics,Ji'nan 250014,China;Institute of Finance and Taxation,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]咸阳师范学院经济与管理学院,陕西咸阳712000 [2]厦门大学经济学院,福建厦门361005 [3]山东财经大学金融学院,山东济南250014 [4]中南财经政法大学财政税务学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《南京财经大学学报》2019年第1期58-68,共11页Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(71562033);国家自然科学基金青年项目(71503118);中国博士后基金面上项目(2017M622168)

摘　　要：在运用Super-SBM模型测算城市基础设施投资效率的基础上,基于中国综合社会调查(CGSS)数据,选取81个城市的4 905个有效样本,采用有序Probit模型实证分析了城市基础设施投资效率对居民满意度评价的影响,并对实证结果进行了稳定性及内生性检验。研究结果发现:(1)我国城市基础设施投资效率总体表现欠佳,尤其是引领全国经济社会发展的大型城市,且大多数样本城市均出现了不同程度的"高投入、低产出"现象,城市基础设施投资未能达到最优配置状态;(2)城市基础设施投资效率对居民满意度评价有显著的正向促进作用,且基础设施投资效率从均值0. 622 5开始的边际变化会引发居民对基础设施建设的非常不满意评价、不满意评价分别有9. 30%、3. 80%的下降,对一般评价、比较满意评价及非常满意评价分别有0. 10%、1. 09%、0. 12%的提升,不过分地区考察时发现该作用效果存在地区异质性;(3)运用工具变量估计法进行内生性检验发现,城市基础设施投资效率仍对居民满意度有显著的促进作用,且内生性因素克服后,居民的满意度评价更高;(4)年龄、户籍、住房面积等控制变量对居民满意度评价有正向影响,城市人口规模、平均职工工资等变量对居民满意度评价有负向影响,经济发展水平与居民满意度评价水平存在倒"U"型关系。By using Super-SBM model to estimate urban infrastructure investment efficiency and selecting 4905 valid samples of 81 cities from China general social survey(CGSS)data,this paper uses the Ordered Probit Model to empirically analyze the impact of urban infrastructure investment efficiency on the evaluation of residents'satisfaction,and tests the stability and endogeneity of empirical results.The results show that:(1)The overall performance of China's urban infrastructure investment efficiency is poor,especially the larger cities leading the overall performance of the national economic and social development is poorer.And most of the sample cities have different levels of“higher input,lower output”phenomenon,the urban infrastructure investment fails to reach the optimal configuration state.(2)The urban infrastructure investment efficiency plays a significant positive role in promoting the residents'satisfaction evaluation,and marginal changes of infrastructure investment efficiency from mean 0.6225 respectively causes residents'very dissatisfied evaluation and dissatisfied evaluation in infrastructure construction drop by 9.30% and 3.80%,causes residents'general evaluation,relatively satisfactory evaluation and very satisfactory evaluation in infrastructure construction rise by 0.10%,1.09% and 0.12%,while it has found that there is the regional heterogeneity in this effect.(3)Using the instrumental variable estimation method to test endogeneity has found that the urban infrastructure investment efficiency still has a significant role in promoting the residents'satisfaction evaluation,and after the endogenous factors are overcome,the residents'satisfaction evaluation is higher.(4)The age,household registration and housing area of control variables have a positive impact on residents'satisfaction evaluation,while the size of urban population,the average wage of workers and so on have a negative impact on residents'satisfaction evaluation,and there is an inverted“U”relationship between the economic developmen

关 键 词：城市基础设施 投资效率 居民满意度 Super-SBM模型 有序PROBIT模型 工具变量 

分 类 号：F810[经济管理—财政学]