国民政府时期立法解释制度存废考议  

On the Abolishment of the Legislative Interpretation System in the Period of the National Government

作　　者：李相森[1] Li Xiangsen(School of Law,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing Jiangsu 211815)

机构地区：[1]南京审计大学法学院,江苏南京211815

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2019年第2期158-166,共9页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：2018年国家社会科学基金青年项目"我国统一法律解释制度构建研究"的阶段性研究成果(项目编号:18CFX005)

摘　　要：国民政府时期,立法院作为最高立法机构一度接受提请者的法律解释请求,针对法律实施过程中的疑问,通过议决法律解释案的方式解释法律。但此种解答法律疑义方式的立法解释制度最终因与司法机关职掌法律解释的世界法制潮流相悖,与司法院统一解释法令制度界限不明、功能重叠,以及在理论与实践上存在窒碍而废止。历史证明,法律解释权不能为立法机关所垄断,独立的立法解释制度亦无存在之必要。当前我国的全国人大常委会立法解释制度亟须在解释权的定位、配置及行使方式上进行变革。During the period of national government,the legislative yuan as a full-time top legislature once accepted the legal interpretation requests,and made legal interpretation by way of approving legal interpretation cases.The legislative interpretation system was abolished for the reasons that it was contrary to the world legal trend that the interpretation power charged by the judicial organs,the legislative interpretation power can’t be clearly divided from the uniform interpretation power of the Judicial Yuan,the functions of legislative interpretation were overlap with the uniform interpretation,and the existing obstacles in theory and practice.History proves that the power of legal interpretation cannot be monopolized by the legislature,and the independent system of legislative interpretation is not necessary.At present,the legislative interpretation system led by the standing Committee of the National People Congress of our country needs to reform in the orientation,disposition and exercise of the interpretation power.

关 键 词：立法院 立法解释 法律解释 国民政府 

分 类 号：D909.92[政治法律—法学理论]