检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周莉欣 Zhou Lixin(Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 400031)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2018年第6期31-36,44,共7页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
摘 要:随着证券市场不断发展,我国唯一的证券虚假陈述损害赔偿额计算规则难以应对现阶段多样化的证券虚假陈述违法行为。本文对我国虚假陈述损害赔偿计算规则的运用现状进行了实证研究,发现了我国实践中法官对于虚假陈述损害赔偿计算规则运用的创新点与局限。究其缘由,主要为法律供给不足,计算规则僵硬、欠缺科学性等原因造成。最后本文提出了从"一刀切"到"具体问题具体分析"的改进思路,并建议构建多种赔偿计算规则并存的证券欺诈民事赔偿体系。With the continuous development of the securities market,China's only calculation rules of damage compensation for misrepresentation is difficult to deal with the diversified misrepresentation illegal act at this stage.This article conducted an empirical study on the current situation of the application of the calculation rules of damage compensation for misrepresentation in China,and found the innovations and limitations of the use of the rules by judges in China's practice.The reason is mainly due to the insufficient legal supply,rigid calculation rules and lack of scientificity.In the end,this article put forward the improvement ideas,and proposed to construct a civil compensation system for securities fraud with multiple compensation calculation rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15