食管心房调搏术用于阵发性室上性心动过速的治疗效果分析  

Therapeutic Effect of Esophageal Pacing in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia

作　　者：寇轩粉[1] Kou Xuanfen(No.1 Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471000)

机构地区：[1]河南科技大学第一附属医院,洛阳471000

出　　处：《数理医药学杂志》2019年第2期184-185,共2页Journal of Mathematical Medicine

摘　　要：目的:在治疗阵发性室上性心动过速中对应用食道调搏术的终止方法治疗效果进行探讨。方法:选取某院2015年10月～2017年8月期间收治的104例阵发性室上性心动过速患者,其中52例为房室折返性心动过速(AVRT组),其余52例为房室结内折返性心动过速(AVNRT组),对两组患者均采用超速抑制法与猝发脉冲法进行治疗,对比治疗效果及成功率。结果:终止成功率方面,AVRT组中,超速抑制法为61.54%,猝发脉冲法为88.46%,两种方法差异显著,有统计学意义,P<0.05;AVNRT组中,超速抑制法为69.23%,猝发脉冲法为92.31%,两种方法差异显著,有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论:与超速抑制法相比,猝发脉冲法对终止室上性心动过速的诊治成功率更高,值得推广。Objective:To investigate the therapeutic effect of esophageal pacing in the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia(PSVT).Methods:104 patients of PSVT admitted in a hospital from October 2015 to August 2017 were divided into the AVRT group and the AVNRT group.52 cases were atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia(AVRT group),the remaining 52 cases were reentrant tachycardia in atrioventricular junction(AVNRT group).Overdive soppand and burst pulse were used in both groups,compared the treatment effect and success rate.Results:The success rate of overdive soppand was 61.54%,burst pulse method was 88.46%in the AVRT group,the difference between the two methods was significant and statistically significant(P<0.05).In the AVNRT group,the overdive soppand method was 69.23%and the burst pulse method was 92.31%,the difference between the two methods was significant and statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Comparing with overdive soppand,the successful rate of diagnosis and treatment of supraventricular tachycardia is higher by burst pulse method,which is worth popularizing.

关 键 词：食道调搏 阵发性室上性心动过速 猝发脉冲法 超速抑制法 

分 类 号：R541.71[医药卫生—心血管疾病]