统合理学与心学的《论语学案》  

The Case of Confucian Analects: An Academic Integration of Neo-Confucianism and the Mind-Philosophy Thoughts

作　　者：唐明贵[1] Tang Minggui

机构地区：[1]聊城大学哲学系

出　　处：《中原文化研究》2019年第2期11-19,共9页The Central Plains Culture Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"明代<论语>学研究"(16AZX010);国家社会科学基金重大项目"域外<论语>学研究"(16ZDA108)阶段性成果

摘　　要：为了扭转明末学风之弊,刘宗周在《论语学案》中,一方面袭用和辩驳朱学,不仅直接引用朱注,而且承沿"理一分殊""存天理,灭人欲"以及"主敬"等理学思想;不仅批驳朱子的经文解释,而且也质疑其诸如"天地之性"与"气质之性"等主张。另一方面承袭和修正王学,他不仅征引阳明之解释,而且还吸收其"良知为知""克去私意"及"心体"等思想;不仅直陈阳明学之不当处,而且还通过辟佛、重慎独以针砭王学末流。同时,他还融合朱王的道心和人心说,融合朱王之说解释"学"。其核心旨在不拘门户,博采众长,融通理学与心学,以维学脉于不坠。这也确立了刘宗周在理学史和明代学术史上的重要地位。In view of the bad learning ethos in the late Ming Dynasty, Liu Zongzhou mixed up Neo-Confucianism and Wang Yangming’s theory in The Case of Confucian Analects. On the one hand, Liu referenced Zhu Xi’s annotations, and took over the thoughts of Neo-Confucianism. Besides, Liu questioned Zhu Xi’s doctrine and refuted some of Zhu’s interpretations of scripture. On the other hand, Liu Zongzhou inherited and absorbed Wang Yangming’s thoughts, as well as cited Wang’s annotations. Yet Liu indicated some improper statements in Wang’s annotations and criticized the drawbacks of Wang School. Liu tried not to be constrained by the factions. In fact, his work absorbed advantages of different theories. Through an academic integration of Neo-Confucianism and the Mind-Philosophy thoughts, Liu strived for the inheritance of scholar thoughts, and got a footing in the history of Neo-Confucianism and in the academic history of the Ming Dynasty.

关 键 词：刘宗周 理学 心学 《论语学案》 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学] B248[历史地理—中国史]