新出土史料与古史研究中的问题  

New Unearthed History Source and Issues of Ancient History Research

作　　者：李锐[1] Li Rui

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院

出　　处：《中原文化研究》2019年第2期50-53,共4页The Central Plains Culture Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"中国国家起源研究的理论与方法"(12&ZD133)子课题;上海085社会学学科内涵建设科研项目阶段性成果

摘　　要：近年出土文献特别是简帛中,有不少和古史相关的篇章。不少人借之讨论古史问题,裘锡圭先生由之评价疑古派的古史得失,并且仍然信奉顾颉刚古史从大禹开始的观点。其说引起了学界的注意。郭永秉先生也利用出土文献谈古史问题,其后他解读裘锡圭先生的文章时对一些问题有深入讨论,对一些新公布材料的解读也欲从顾颉刚、裘锡圭之说,但实质上与顾颉刚之说有很大不同。所论问题的关键,看似讨论禹和文王的神性问题,其实是古书史料的认识问题,古史的时间与空间问题,而不是态度的问题。当前应该在方法和理论上进行反思,以告别旧的范式,探索新的范式。In recent years, there are several pieces of unearthed literature related to ancient history, especially bamboo slips and silk manuscript. Many scholars have discussed issues of ancient history by using them. Professor Qiu Xigui use unearthed literature to evaluate gain and loss of Doubting Antiquity School’s ancient history research, and still believes in Gu’s point that Chinese ancient history begins with Yu the great, which raised academia’s concern. Professor Guo Yongbing also use unearthed literature to discuss issues of ancient history. Then he discussed some issues deeply when he interpreted Professor Qiu’s papers. Professor Guo’s interpretation of some history source published recently follows Professor Gu and Qiu’s point, too. However, in fact his point is essentially very different from Professor Gu’s. The key issue seems to be divinity of Yu the great and King Wen of Zhou Dynasty, but rather the understanding of history source in ancient literature, the space-time issues of ancient history , instead of attitude. Now we should rethink of the theory and methods to find new paradigm replacing the previous.

关 键 词：出土简帛 古史 疑古 走出疑古 顾颉刚 

分 类 号：K221[历史地理—历史学] H121[历史地理—中国史]