检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:裴仕彬[1,2] Pei Shibin
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学 [2]广东省深圳市龙岗区人民检察院
出 处:《法治社会》2019年第2期116-126,共11页Law-Based Society
摘 要:检察裁量权是刑事诉讼运行机制中的重要枢纽。新加坡自1965年建立检察制度后,检察官就拥有起诉、不起诉、变更起诉、辩诉交易等广泛的裁量权。值得注意的是,新加坡检察裁量权运行的效果良好,至今没有检察官因为滥用裁量权而被追究责任,新加坡法律对检察裁量权的保障及规制起到了很好的双重推动作用。我国检察机关正在推进司法责任制改革,新加坡的经验做法会为此提供很好的启示。Prosecutorial discretion is an important hinge in the operation mechanism of criminal procedure.Since the establishment of the prosecutorial system in 1965,the prosecutors in Singapore have extensive discretion,such as prosecution,non-prosecution,changing prosecution,plea bargaining and so on.It is worth noting that the operation of prosecutorial discretion in Singapore has a good effect and so far no prosecutor has been held responsible for abuse of discretion because Singapore law has played a dual role in promoting the protection and regulation of prosecutorial discretion.China’s procuratorial organs are pushing the judicial responsibility system reform and Singapore’s experience and practice can provide a good reference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117