检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李国山[1] 朱文瑞 Li Guoshan;Zhu Wenrui(Nankai University)
机构地区:[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350
出 处:《学术界》2019年第2期68-74,235,236,共9页Academics
基 金:教育部规划基金项目"维特根斯坦语言哲学研究与文献翻译"(15YJA720002)的阶段性成果
摘 要:维特根斯坦在其前期著作《逻辑哲学论》中阐述了他的逻辑哲学,其核心思想为:逻辑命题是重言式。这种逻辑哲学以其新颖和简洁受到了广泛关注,并产生了巨大影响。维特根斯坦本人在其后期哲学研究中,很快意识到了前期逻辑哲学存在的问题并作了自我批判。逻辑实证主义者吸取了这种逻辑哲学的思想成果,并发展出饱受批评的约定论逻辑哲学。前期维特根斯坦的逻辑哲学因此受到了牵连。一旦我们将这种逻辑哲学放回到《逻辑哲学论》的整体思想框架之内,并结合它对前人思想的推进加以把握,便有望获得关于其历史价值的公正评价。In his early work Tractatus,Wittgenstein set forth his philosophy of logic.Its key point is that the logical propositions are tautologies.Due to its novelty and simplicity,his theory received wide attention and had a tremendous impact.However,in his later philosophical investigation,Wittgenstein realized that his early philosophy of logic is seriously flawed and made much self-criticism.The logical positivists absorbed the achievements of his philosophy of logic and developed a kind of conventionalist philosophy of logic,which caused much criticism.His philosophy of logic was thus compromised.The present paper argues that only by putting it back into the thought framework of Tractatus,and taking its theoretical advancement into account,might we have an appropriate assessment of the historical value of his philosophy of logic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.97