检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹妍 王欢 CAO Yan;WANG Huan(Department of Intensive Care Unit, HanyangHospital, Wuhan Hubei 430050, China)
机构地区:[1]武汉市汉阳医院重症医学科,湖北武汉430050
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2019年第7期163-165,共3页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探究ICU胸腹多发伤患者抢救中实施干预性护理的可行性。方法选取2015年1月—2017年12月在我院ICU接受治疗的62例胸腹多发伤患者随机分为两组,对照组给予常规护理,观察组在此基础上给予干预性护理,对比两组患者的抢救情况、不良反应发生情况及护理满意度。结果护理后观察组患者的抢救成功率(96.77%)高于对照组(80.65%),观察组患者的不良反应发生率(6.45%)低于对照组(25.81%),观察组患者护理满意度(93.55%)高于对照组(67.74%),差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论 ICU胸腹多发伤患者抢救中实施干预性护理的应用效果良好,可行性高。Objective To explore the feasibility of implementing intervention nursing in in rescuing icu patients with multiple injuries of thorax and abdomen. Methods 62 patients with multiple thoracoabdominal injuries treated in ICU from January 2015 to December 2017 were randomly divided into two groups. The control group was given routine nursing, while the observation group was given intervention nursing on this basis. The rescue, adverse reactions and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were investigated. Results After treatment, the success rate of rescue in the observation group (96.77%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (80.65%). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (6.45%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (25.81%). The satisfaction rate of the observation group (93.55%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (67.74%), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Interventional nursing for ICU patients with multiple thoracoabdominal injuries has good effect and high feasibility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145