检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:隋晓影[1] 张淑红[1] 翟春梅[1] 林守香[1] 李艳艳[1] SUI Xiao-ying;ZHANG Shu-hong;ZHAI Chun-mei;LIN Shou-xiang;LI Yan-yan(Department of Oncology, Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing,Heilongjiang Province,163001 China)
机构地区:[1]大庆油田总医院肿瘤科,黑龙江大庆163001
出 处:《系统医学》2019年第3期165-167,共3页Systems Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨综合护理干预在宫颈癌放疗患者中的应用效果。方法随机选择该院在2012年1月—2017年12月期间接受放疗的患者100例,按照随机对照表法将全部患者分为观察组(50例)和对照组(50例)。对照组50例患者采用的是常规护理措施,观察组在常规护理的基础上采取综合护理干预,内容包括:心理护理、健康教育、饮食指导、不良反应的护理以及出院指导。比较两组患者不良反应发生率、生活质量评分及护理满意度。结果观察组中放射性皮炎8例(16.0%),造血系统不良反应5例(10.0%),膀胱放射反应3例(6.0%),放射性肠炎2例(4.0%),对照组中放射性皮炎17例(34.0%),造血系统不良反应13例(26.0%),膀胱放射反应10例(20.0%),放射性肠炎9例(18.0%),两组各项不良反应发生率相比均差异有统计学意义(χ~2=4.320,、4.336、4.332、5.005);观察组的心理维度(17.2±5.3)分、生理维度(15.4±4.1)分、环境维度(15.1±4.8)分、社会维度(14.8±4.5)分,对照组的心理维度(11.9±4.2)分、生理维度(9.6±3.3)分、环境维度(11.3±4.5)分、社会维度(10.7±3.6)分,各项评分均差异有统计学意义(t=5.542、7.792、4.083、5.031,P<0.01)。结论综合护理干预可以有效预防和减少宫颈癌放疗患者的不良反应,提高患者的生活质量,提高护理满意度,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the application effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with cervical cancer radiotherapy. Methods 100 patients who underwent radiotherapy between January 2012 and December 2017 were randomly selected. All patients were divided into observation group(50 cases) and control group(50 cases) according to the randomized table method. In the control group, 50 patients were treated with routine nursing measures.The observation group took comprehensive nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing, including psychological nursing, health education, diet guidance, adverse reaction nursing and discharge guidance. The incidence of adverse reactions, quality of life scores and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results In the observation group, 8 cases(16.0%) of radiation dermatitis, 5 cases(10.0%) of adverse reactions of hematopoietic system, 3 cases(6.0%) of bladder radiation reaction, 2 cases(4.0%) of radiation enteritis, and radiation dermatitis in control group17 cases of(34.0%), 13 cases(26.0%) had adverse reactions in the hematopoietic system, 10 cases(20.0%) had bladder radiation reaction, and 9 cases(18.0%) had radiation enteritis. The incidence of adverse reactions in both groups was(χ^2=4.320, 4.336, 4.332, 5.005, P<0.05);psychological dimensions of the observation group(17.2±5.3)points, physiological dimensions(15.4±4.1)points, environmental dimension(15.1±4.8)points, social dimension(14.8±4.5)points, the psychological dimension of the control group(11.9±4.2)points, physiological dimension(9.6±3.3)points, environmental dimension(11.3 ±4.5)points, social dimension(10.7 ±3.6)points, the different was statistically significant(t =5.542, 7.792,4.083, 5.031, P<0.01). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively prevent and reduce the adverse reactions of patients with cervical cancer radiotherapy, improve the quality of life of patients and improve the satisfaction of nursing. It is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120