中国近代史前沿的评价标准  

Evaluation Criteria for the Frontier of Modern Chinese History

作　　者：牛大勇[1] Niu Dayong

机构地区：[1]北京大学历史学系,教授北京100871

出　　处：《中国社会科学评价》2019年第1期64-67,143,共5页China Social Science Review

摘　　要：无论哪个国家哪个国籍的学者,只要被认为取得了"前沿成果",就是指其把某项研究在国际学术界推进到比前人更尖端、更精深的境界,而不只是体现了某一国的学术前沿。在这个意义上可以讲:学术无国界。是否够得上"前沿"?以什么为检验的标志?最可靠的标准,还是国内外学术界的同行专家们的公认度。Scholars,no matter from what country or with what nationality,are considered to have achieved“frontier achievements”when they have promoted a certain research area in international academia to a more advanced and in-depth state than their predecessors had;crossing the academic frontier within a certain country is not the same.In this sense,academics have no borders.So what deserves to be called“frontier”?What signifies a proper evaluation?The most reliable standard is the recognition of peer experts at home and abroad.

关 键 词：中国近代史 学术前沿 评价标准 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]