相邻不可量物排放条款在我国的流变及启示  

The Evolution of Emission Clause in China and Its Implications

作　　者：李云波[1] IJ Yunbo(College of Law,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou,Jiangsu 225127)

机构地区：[1]扬州大学法学院,江苏扬州225127

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2019年第1期32-40,共9页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社科青年基金项目(14YJC820031)

摘　　要：相邻不可量物排放条款在我国始自大清民律草案中的"气响侵入之禁止"条款,且为民国民法典所沿袭,该条款是在借鉴德国民法典第906条的基础上设立的。新中国成立后,在第三次民法典起草中产生的第三稿、第四稿及各民法典学者建议稿中,均有设立独立的相邻不可量物排放条款的尝试与努力。但我国物权法第90条将不可量物与液体、固体等可量物质相混杂,且未在当事人间配置清晰的权利义务,致使其行为指引功能及司法裁判功能欠缺。我国未来民法典有必要设立独立的相邻不可量物排放条款。The emission clause in China started with no gas or noise intrusion clause in Civil Code Draft of Qing Dynasty,and was followed by Civil Code of Republic of China.No gas or noise intrusion clause was based on the reference to Article 906 of German Civil Code.After the founding of the People’s Republic of China,the emission clause was established in the third and fourth versions of the third drafting of Civil Code and in the version proposed by civil code scholars respectively.However,Article 90 of our Real Rights Law didn’t separate imponderable substances from ponderable ones like liquids or solids,and failed to set clear rights and obligations to the parties involved,which led to the lack of the guiding function and judicial function.It is necessary to set up an independent emission clause in the future civil code of China.

关 键 词：相邻关系 不可量物 容忍义务 民法典 

分 类 号：DF521[政治法律—民商法学]