列宁的“四月转向”及其限度——从季诺维也夫对“不断革命论”的批判说起  

Lenin's “Change in April” and its Limits: on Zinoviev's Critique on “Theory of Uninterrupted Revolution”

作　　者：吕佳翼 LV Jia-yi(School of Marxism,Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

机构地区：[1]浙江工业大学马克思主义学院,杭州310023

出　　处：《唐山学院学报》2019年第2期38-45,共8页Journal of Tangshan University

基　　金：2017年度国家社科基金后期资助项目(17FKS025);2017年度浙江工业大学人文社会科学研究基金重点项目(SKY-ZX-20170020)

摘　　要：围绕列宁的"四月转向"及其限度问题,讨论季诺维也夫对托洛茨基"不断革命论"的批判。文章从是否存在列宁的"四月转向"(俄国革命是二阶段抑或一阶段)、"四月转向"中的农民问题、列宁"四月转向"的限度(托洛茨基在列宁身后对"不断革命论"的完成)三个方面加以论述,从而澄清了列宁在二月革命后的理论变化及其与"不断革命论"的关系。Around Lenin’s "Change in April" and its limits, this paper discusses Zinoviev’s critique on "Theory of Uninterrupted Revolution" put forward by Trotsky. After the analysis of the following three aspects: whether Lenin’s "Change in April" existed(Were there two stages or one stage in the Russian Revolution);the peasant problem in Lenin’s "Change in April";the limit of Lenin’s "Change in April"("Theory of Uninterrupted Revolution" finished by Trotsky after Lenin’s death), it is clarified about the theoretical change of Lenin after the February Revolution and the relationship between Lenin’s change and the "Theory of Uninterrupted Revolution".

关 键 词：列宁 季诺维也夫 托洛茨基 不断革命论 四月转向 

分 类 号：A735[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]