检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王喜峰[1] 沈大军[2] WANG Xifeng;SHEN Dajun(Institute of Quantitative and Technical Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Science,Beijing 100732,China;School of Environment and Nature Resources,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院数量经济与技术经济研究所,北京100732 [2]中国人民大学环境学院,北京100872
出 处:《生态经济》2019年第4期146-151,178,共7页Ecological Economy
基 金:国家重点研发计划课题"东北粮食主产区水-能源-粮食纽带关系及保障技术"(2017YFC0404603);山西省采煤对水资源影响的收费补偿政策及关键技术研究项目;国家水资源费项目"水资源管理考核"
摘 要:国内水资源经济学多被认为是国外资源环境经济学与中国水资源实践相结合的产物,然而,研究显示两者有着不同的发展路径和制度特征。文章首先梳理了经济学理论体系,辨析了水资源经济学相关概念,认为国外的水资源经济学和国内的水资源学有着密切的联系。其次,梳理了国外水资源经济学的理论基础、发展逻辑,认为国外水资源经济学遵循于微观经济学的成本—收益分析、外部性、外部性内部化、生态价值的逻辑。微观机制与宏观研究的结合成为国外宏观研究的基础。再次,成本—宏观收益是国内研究的基础,其发展逻辑符合我国水资源管理改革的实践,发展逻辑是从宏观到微观的导向。最后,从产权层面、管理层面、规划层面分析了这种差异的原因。Water is the basis of ecology, and water resources economics is of great theoretical significance for guiding the construction of ecological civilization. First of all, this paper sorts the theoretical system of economics, and differentiates the concepts and research scope of water resources, water resources science and water resources economics. Therefore, the paper holds that foreign water resource economics is essentially related to domestic water resources science. Secondly, this paper reviews the theoretical basis and development logic of foreign water resources economics, and points out that the economics of foreign water resources is based on the cost-benefit analysis of microeconomics, externality, internalization of externalities and the logic of ecological value. Although the research of the above-mentioned micro mechanism can be combined with the research of macro economy, it has not been paid enough attention. Thirdly, the domestic water resources economics research is in line with the practice of water resources management reform in China. The development logic is from macro orientation to micro orientation, reflecting the transformation of water resources management mechanism to market mechanism. Finally, this paper analyzes the reasons for the difference from the perspectives of property right level, the management level and the planning level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.145.236