检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:廖朴[1] 吕刘 贺晔平 LIAO Pu;LU Liu;HE Yeping
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学中国精算研究院 [2]中央财经大学保险学院
出 处:《保险研究》2019年第2期63-77,共15页Insurance Studies
摘 要:农村金融是农村经济发展的重要内生动力,创新金融扶贫体制对我国农村深度贫困地区的脱贫攻坚工作具有重要意义。本文基于多重均衡模型,对比研究信贷、保险、"信贷+保险"三类金融产品的扶贫效果,在不同的信贷和保险产品结构下得出陷贫概率,进而得出金融扶贫产品的精准设计,以创新金融扶贫体制,从而解决我国深度贫困的问题。研究表明:单独信贷产品扶贫无效;保险能够帮助阈值以上人群摆脱潜在贫困,但对深度贫困无效;"信贷+保险"能解决一定程度的深度贫困问题,比单独信贷或单独保险的扶贫效果更好。Rural finance is an important endogenous driving force for rural economic development.It is of great significance to innovate the financial poverty alleviation system for the work of poverty alleviation in the poverty-stricken areas in China.In order to innovate the financial poverty alleviation system and crack the hard nut of destitution,this paper,on the basis of the multiple equilibrium model,compared the poverty alleviation effects of credit,insurance and"credit+ insurance"financial products,arrived at the bankruptcy probability of different credit and insurance products,and got the accurate design of financial poverty alleviation products.Studies have shown that:credit products alone are ineffective in poverty alleviation;insurance can help people above the threshold to completely cast off potential poverty,but not for those in deep poverty;"credit +insurance"can solve the problem of deep poverty to a certain extent,which has better poverty alleviation effect than credit alone or insurance alone.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28